Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

William Ray Price (Missouri)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
William Ray Price
Image of William Ray Price
Prior offices
Missouri Supreme Court

Education

Bachelor's

University of Iowa, 1974

Law

Washington and Lee University School of Law, 1978


William Ray Price, Jr. was a justice on the Missouri Supreme Court. He was appointed to the court on April 7, 1992 by Governor John Ashcroft. Price was then retained in November 1994 and November 2006. He retired on August 1, 2012.[1]

He was Chief Justice from July of 2009 until June of 2011.[2]

Education

Price received his B.A. in Religion from the University of Iowa in 1974 and his J.D. from Washington and Lee University School of Law in 1978.[3]

Career

From 1978 to 1992, Price worked with the Lathrop Norquist law firm, first as an associate and later as a partner.[3]

Awards and associations

Awards

  • 2006 The Claire McCaskill Award, Missouri Association of Drug Court Professionals
  • 2002 The Roosevelt Award, Greene County Drug Court
  • 2001 Robert Walston Chubb Award, Legal Services of Eastern Missouri
  • 1996 Distinguished Non-Alumnus Award, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law[3]

Associations

  • 2009-2011 Chairman, National Association of Drug Court Professionals
  • 2008-present Judiciary Advisory Board, Searle Civil Justice Institute
  • 2009 Board Member, Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource Center
  • 2001-present Chairman, Missouri Drug Court Commission[3]

For a complete list of Justice Price's accomplishments, please visit: Justice Price's Biography

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Price received a campaign finance score of 1.02, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 0.001 that justices received in Missouri.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes