Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Wisconsin Question 2, Require Legislative Approval for State Expenditure of Federal Funds Amendment (August 2024)
Wisconsin Question 2 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date August 13, 2024 | |
Topic State legislatures measures and Administration of government | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
Wisconsin Question 2, the Require Legislative Approval for State Expenditure of Federal Funds Amendment, was on the ballot in Wisconsin as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on August 13, 2024. It was defeated.[1][2]
A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to require legislative approval via a joint resolution before the governor can expend federal money appropriated to the state. |
A "no" vote opposed this amendment, thereby allowing the governor to accept and allocate federal funds without seeking legislative approval. |
Election results
Wisconsin Question 2 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 521,639 | 42.47% | ||
706,637 | 57.53% |
Overview
How would Question 2 have changed how federal funds are allocated?
- See also: Text of measure
Question 2 would have required legislative approval via a joint resolution or legislative rule in order for the governor to allocate federal funds on behalf of the state. At the time of the election, state law authorized the governor to accept and allocate federal funds.[2][3]
The resolution that placed this amendment on the ballot placed a second ballot question, Question 1, on the ballot, which would have prohibited the legislature from delegating its power to appropriate money. It was also defeated.
Who supported and opposed Question 2?
- See also: Support and Opposition
Question 2 received unanimous support from voting Republicans during both considerations of the amendment. State Sen. Howard Marklein (R-17) said, "This resolution increases accountability, efficiency, and transparency in the expenditure of funds received from the federal government by restoring the legislature's role in approving those expenditures."[4]
The amendment was unanimously voted against by voting Democrats during both legislative sessions. The Wisconsin Education Association Council, Wisconsin Association of Local Health Departments & Boards, Wisconsin Conservation Voters, and Wisconsin Public Health Association, also opposed the amendment. Jennifer Giegerich, government affairs director of Wisconsin Conservation Voters, said, "[The measure] would amend the Wisconsin Constitution to add another level of government process during times when we are most vulnerable and depend on efficiency and a smooth process to receive much needed support. Our current system of the governor and legislature working together to fashion a timely state budget, with known deadlines and a long deliberative process, is not effective when dealing with emergencies."[4]
Who had authority over federal funds in other states?
In 2021, Ballotpedia conducted a survey on the federal grant review process that included the question: Who has decision rights over American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State Fiscal Recovery Fund allocations in your state?
The survey found:
- Eight states have executive decision rights over ARPA allocations, including Wisconsin.
- Six states have legislative authority over ARPA allocations.
- 34 states have joint legislative/executive authority over ARPA funds. These states allocate ARPA funds through the appropriations process, which requires legislative approval followed by a governor's signature. In the case of a gubernatorial veto, a state legislature may act unilaterally to override the governor's veto.
- Two states did not specify which government branch has decision rights over ARPA funds. Independent staff research proved inconclusive.
Text of measure
Ballot question
The ballot question was as follows:[2]
“ | Shall section 35 (2) of article IV of the constitution be created to prohibit the governor from allocating any federal moneys the governor accepts on behalf of the state without the approval of the legislature by joint resolution or as provided by legislative rule?[5] | ” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article IV, Wisconsin Constitution
The ballot measure would have added Section 35 of Article IV of the Wisconsin Constitution. The following underlined text would have been added:[2]
Section 35
(2) The governor may not allocate any federal moneys the governor accepts on behalf of the state without the approval of the legislature by joint resolution or as provided by legislative rule.[5]
Full text
The full text can be read here.
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 23, and the FRE is 7. The word count for the ballot title is 42.
Support
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. Dale Kooyenga (R)
- State Sen. Howard Marklein (R)
- State Rep. Robert Wittke (R)
Organizations
- Badger Institute
- Institute for Reforming Government (IRG) Action Fund
- Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
- Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- Gov. Tony Evers (D)
Unions
Organizations
- League of Women Voters of Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Association of Local Health Departments & Boards
- Wisconsin Conservation Voters
- Wisconsin Democracy Campaign
- Wisconsin Public Health Association
Arguments
Campaign finance
One committee—Badger Institute Referendum Committee— was registered in support of Questions 1 and 2. It reported over $16,774.00 in cash and in-kind contributions. Two committees—Wisconsin Votes No and Preserve Wisconsin's Constitution—were registered in opposition to Questions 1 and 2. The committee reported $2.6 million in contributions. If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.[6]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $10,000.00 | $6,774.00 | $16,774.00 | $15,208.00 | $21,982.00 |
Oppose | $2,210,450.31 | $433,785.68 | $2,644,235.99 | $2,940,611.53 | $3,374,397.21 |
Total | $2,220,450.31 | $440,559.68 | $2,661,009.99 | $2,955,819.53 | $3,396,379.21 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.[7]
Committees in support of Question 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Badger Institute Referendum Committee | $10,000.00 | $6,774.00 | $16,774.00 | $15,208.00 | $21,982.00 |
Total | $10,000.00 | $6,774.00 | $16,774.00 | $15,208.00 | $21,982.00 |
Donors
The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in support of the ballot measure.[7]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Badger Institute | $10,000.00 | $5,218.00 | $15,218.00 |
Opposition
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in opposition to the ballot measure.[7]
Committees in opposition to Question 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Wisconsin Votes No | $1,875,698.25 | $75,705.12 | $1,951,403.37 | $2,303,479.18 | $2,379,184.30 |
Preserve Wisconsin's Constitution | $334,752.06 | $358,080.56 | $692,832.62 | $637,132.35 | $995,212.91 |
Total | $2,210,450.31 | $433,785.68 | $2,644,235.99 | $2,940,611.53 | $3,374,397.21 |
Donors
The following table shows the top donors to the committees registered in opposition to the ballot measure.[7]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
League of Conservatioin Voters | $1,375,000.00 | $0.00 | $1,375,000.00 |
The Nature Conservancy | $267,752.06 | $346,969.00 | $614,721.06 |
Wisconsin Conservation Voters | $338,600.00 | $467.00 | $339,067.00 |
Green Advocacy Project | $150,000.00 | $0.00 | $150,000.00 |
AFSCME International | $0.00 | $62,500.00 | $62,500.00 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Background
Wisconsin state law on governor accepting federal funds
Chapter 16, Section 54 of the Wisconsin Statutes authorized the governor to accept and allocate federal funds. The section reads:[8]
“ | Whenever the United States government shall make available to this state funds for the education, the promotion of health, the relief of indigency, the promotion of agriculture or for any other purpose other than the administration of the tribal or any individual funds of Wisconsin Indians, the governor on behalf of the state is authorized to accept the funds so made available. In exercising the authority herein conferred, the governor may stipulate as a condition of the acceptance of the act of congress by this state such conditions as in the governor's discretion may be necessary to safeguard the interests of this state.[5] | ” |
The Wisconsin Policy Forum, using data from the Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau and Department of Workforce Development and Health Services, estimated the fiscal impact of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (2020), Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) (2020), and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) (2021), in Wisconsin to be $19.9 billion in federal funds. The chart below categorizes how the federal funding was allocated.[9]
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021
Administrative State |
---|
![]() |
Five Pillars of the Administrative State |
•Agency control • Executive control • Judicial control •Legislative control • Public Control |
Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
|
Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker. |
- See also: American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was a federal bill passed by the 117th Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden (D) on March 11, 2021, to provide economic relief in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to the White House, the key features of the law included the following government initiatives and investments:[10]
- Spend approximately $160 billion on national vaccination program and response
- Spend approximately $130 billion to safely reopen schools
- Distribute $1,400 per person in relief payments
- Extend unemployment benefits to September 6, 2021
- Increase Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits by 15 percent through September 2021
- Increase the Child Tax Credit from $2,000 to $3,000 per child over age 6 and $3,600 per child under age 6
- Increase the Earned Income Tax Credit
- Expand childcare assistance and provide an additional tax credit for childcare costs
- Provide $1 billion to states for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients
- Lower health insurance premiums
Decision rights over ARPA fund allocations by state
Ballotpedia's 2021 state survey on the federal grant review process included the question: Who has decision rights over American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State Fiscal Recovery Fund allocations in your state?
The survey revealed the following findings:
- Eight states have executive decision rights over ARPA allocations, including Wisconsin.
- Six states have legislative authority over ARPA allocations.
- 34 states have joint legislative/executive authority over ARPA funds. These states allocate ARPA funds through the appropriations process, which requires legislative approval followed by a governor's signature. In the case of a gubernatorial veto, a state legislature may act unilaterally to override the governor's veto.
- Two states did not specify which government branch has decision rights over ARPA funds. Independent staff research proved inconclusive.
Wisconsin did not respond to the 2021 survey. Independent staff research found state executive agencies were in charge of allocating relief funds.[11]
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act is a federal law that expanded benefits through the joint federal-state unemployment insurance program during the coronavirus pandemic. The legislation also included $1,200 payments to certain individuals, funding for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, and funds for businesses, hospitals, and state and local governments.[12]
Roughly $339.8 billion was set aside for programs carried out by state and local governments. Of the $339.8 billion, $274 billion was allocated to specific COVID-19 response efforts through block grants.[12]
Federal grant amounts to state and local governments from 1940 through 2023
The following chart shows how much money, according to constant 2017 dollar values, the federal government provided to state and local governments in grants from 1940 through 2023, which means it adjusts for inflation by using the dollar value from the same year (2017) across the entire chart.
Ballotpedia tracked ballot measures on the 2024 ballot proposed in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. To see a list of past ballot measures related to the coronavirus pandemic, click here.
Ballot measures in response to the coronavirus pandemic and coronavirus-related regulations | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Measure | Description | Election date | Origin | Status |
Arizona | Emergency Declarations Amendment | Provides for the state legislature to terminate a state of emergency or alter the emergency powers granted to the governor | November 5, 2024 | Referral | ![]() |
Wisconsin | Require Legislative Approval for State Expenditure of Federal Funds Amendment | Require legislative approval for state expenditure of federal funds | August 13, 2024 | Referral | ![]() |
Wisconsin | Prohibit Legislature from Delegating Appropriations Power Amendment | Prohibit legislature from delegating power to appropriate | August 13, 2024 | Referral | ![]() |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Wisconsin Constitution
In Wisconsin, the state legislature is required to approve an amendment by majority vote in two successive sessions for the amendment to appear on the ballot.
2021-2022 legislative session
The amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 84 (SJR 84). The Wisconsin State Senate approved the amendment by a vote of 21-12 on January 25, 2022. The Wisconsin State Assembly amended and approved SJR 84 by a vote of 60-36 with one not voting on February 23, 2022. The Senate concurred by a vote of 20-11 with two not voting on March 8, 2022.[1]
|
|
2023-2024 legislative session
For its second consideration, the amendment was introduced as Assembly Joint Resolution 6 (AJR 6). The Wisconsin State Assembly amended and approved AJR 6 by a vote of 63-35 with three not voting on February 22, 2024. The Senate concurred by a vote of 22-10 with three not voting on March 12, 2024.[1]
|
|
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Wisconsin
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Wisconsin.
See also
Additional reading
- Nondelegation doctrine
- Reform proposals related to the nondelegation doctrine
- Arguments against the nondelegation doctrine, and in favor of delegation
- Arguments in favor of the nondelegation doctrine, and against delegation
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wisconsin State Legislature, "SJR 84," accessed January 5, 2023
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Wisconsin State Legislature, "Text of AJR 6," accessed February 22, 2024
- ↑ Wisconsin State Legislature "Amendment Memo," February 26, 2024
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Wisconsin State Legislature, "Testimony," accessed March 4, 2024
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Wisconsin Campaign Finance Information System, "View Filed Reports," accessed July 15, 2024
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedfinance
- ↑ Wisconsin State Legislature, "16.54," accessed March 4, 2024
- ↑ Wisconsin Policy Forum, "Unprecedented Aid," April 2021
- ↑ White House, "American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet," accessed March 31, 2021
- ↑ Washington Examiner, "Pandemic relief battle resumes with GOP bill that couples school mental health funding with new reporting requirement," accessed October 27, 2021
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 The Hill, "Senate unanimously passes $2T coronavirus stimulus package," March 25, 2020
- ↑ Wisconsin Election Commission, “Election Day Voting,” accessed May 4, 2023
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Voter Registration and Proof of Residence," accessed May 4, 2023
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 20, 2024
- ↑ Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Wisconsin Voter Registration Application," accessed November 2, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Photo ID," accessed May 4, 2023 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "wvid" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 19.0 19.1 Wisconsin Department of Transportation, "Wisconsin ID card for voting purposes - petition process," accessed May 4, 2023
![]() |
State of Wisconsin Madison (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
|