Zacharie Spurlock

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Zacharie Spurlock

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Elections and appointments
Last election

August 5, 2025

Education

High school

Portage High School

Personal
Birthplace
Indianapolis, Ind.
Contact

Zacharie Spurlock ran for election to the Lansing City Council to represent Ward 4 in Michigan. He lost in the primary on August 5, 2025.

Spurlock completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.

Elections

2025

See also: City elections in Lansing, Michigan (2025)

General election

The candidate list in this election may not be complete.

General election for Lansing City Council Ward 4

Incumbent Peter Spadafore and Heath Lowry are running in the general election for Lansing City Council Ward 4 on November 4, 2025.

Candidate
Peter Spadafore (Nonpartisan)
Heath Lowry (Nonpartisan)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for Lansing City Council Ward 4

Incumbent Peter Spadafore and Heath Lowry defeated Zacharie Spurlock in the primary for Lansing City Council Ward 4 on August 5, 2025.

Candidate
%
Votes
Peter Spadafore (Nonpartisan)
 
56.7
 
2,373
Heath Lowry (Nonpartisan)
 
26.3
 
1,101
Zacharie Spurlock (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
16.4
 
684
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.6
 
24

Total votes: 4,182
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.

Campaign themes

2025

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Zacharie Spurlock completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Spurlock's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I was raised by my Grandparents and Mom in Northwest Indiana, taught to respect those around me and be empathetic for those in need. I took the values instilled in me at a young age to heart, and used those to shape who I am today: A compassionate but strong-minded individual who cares about his family, friends and community.

In 2018 I moved to the Westside Neighborhood in Lansing, Michigan and lived here for a few years. I fell in love with the area, both the city and the state. So in 2020, when I had the choice to stay in the area or move back to Northwest Indiana, I chose to move to Okemos, Michigan. I stayed in Okemos for roughly 4 years, and when deciding where to move next, my husband and I decided to move back to Ward 4 of Lansing, as I couldn't imagine leaving the state nor that area behind. We ended up in the Genesee Neighborhood in a house of our own, and that's where I am now!

Politically, I consider myself a Progressive Democrat. I believe strongly that representatives should represent those in their community, their constituents, and not corporations or party-line interests. I'm a firm believer in the Micro vs Macro political ideology, putting focus on both national politics, state politics, and also local politics.

I look forward to putting forward a clean, but fair, fight towards becoming the City of Lansing's 4th Ward Councilmember this November!
  • It has become abundantly clear that a critical aspect that is severely lacking currently is communication to and with the constituents of Ward 4. To me, this is unacceptable. All officials, but especially local officials, are elected to represent those in their district, their constituents. In my opinion, it's hard to represent constituents if you rarely meet with them to openly discuss their concerns.

    I've pledged to have, at minimum, 2 "Coffee with Councilmember Zak" events a month, both being held at times accessible to all constituents.

    My first bill that I introduce will also be a legal requirement for any elected official in Lansing to hold a constituent meeting at least once per month.
  • To some, a Councilmember position may be a great chance to bolster their resume, their political agenda, or their name in general. To others, it may be a great chance to line their pocket books with taxpayer's hard earned money. Those that go into politics for those reasons are at best wrong, and at worst morally corrupt. My second pledge to the people of Ward 4 is to commit to donating 20% of my salary per year as Councilmember directly back to Ward 4 communities. I am not a wealthy individual, I don't have a family business nor a high-paying college degree to fall back on. But I know that donating money back to my community, my neighbors, is more important than hoarding money in a bank account.
  • In addition to communication being important in official settings, I would strive to be a representative who has an open door policy in all situations. I've often told people to stop and say hi, tell me about your day, if you see me out and about in public. I'm also the only candidate who has listed not just my business line, but also my personal cellphone numbers. I want to be here for the community in any way I can. I'm not a career politician. Truth be told, if I complete my goals as Councilmember I don't know if I'd even run in another position. I'm your local bartender, I'm your neighbor, and I hope to be your representative in the form of Councilmember of Ward 4.
The City of Lansing has had a hard time trying to revitalize the downtown area. While other districts of Lansing (i.e., Oldtown, Reo Town, etc) have found a unique and successful identity, the downtown district still struggles with even keeping shops open past 5pm on most days. As roughly half of downtown Lansing falls in Ward 4, I find it critical to put focus on improving interest in downtown for not just businesses, but also for residents and tourists as well.
As previously mentioned, Ward 4 has the state capitol located in it, along with roughly half of the downtown district. Not only should the elected Councilmember put focus on the neighborhoods in their district, but also put focus on downtown as well. Actively working on making the downtown area a place people (residents, tourists, etc) want to go even when they don't need to go is important. This includes working with politicians who travel from all over the state to come and enjoy the downtown area.
I believe that open door policies, communication, and community outreach/support are the most important things for elected officials to focus on. Especially when looking at local elections, it's my firm belief: Local officials should represent locally. There can, and should, still be concern for a wider area outside of your district, but your district should always come first.
As a hopeful for Councilmember of Ward 4, I believe that there are 3 major responsibilities: First, direct community engagement. Setting meet-and-greet events at times that are accessible to all constituents is a must.

Second, supporting your district, your community, and your neighbors. I have pledged to donate 20% of my salary as Councilmember each year directly back to the community, by setting up a grant system for local community leaders, businesses and cultural centers to apply for.

Third, there is the unique responsibility to represent a section of downtown Lansing, including the capitol building. This means putting focus on being a welcoming and engaging ward and community for all.
Truth be told, my legacy doesn't matter to me. I'm not running for myself, I'm running for the people of this Ward.

I would like to leave Ward 4 in a better place for the disenfranchised voices, for those in working class neighborhoods, and for those who rely on their representative to assist them.
Technically, it would have been the tragedy of 9/11. I remember being in art class and remember the teacher stopping class to turn on the news, and walking us students through what was happening (as much as she could with the limited information she had).

The first historical event that I remember vividly was the 2008 financial crash. I grew up with my mother and grandparents supporting me, and I still remember that entire year. We were already on welfare programs, and we really had to tighten our belts during that time. Obviously being a child, it was burnt into my memory as missing out on fun activities and events that my more affluent classmates could afford.

That being said, my family made the best of it. We never went hungry, we still had game nights, and like many, we pushed through that event.
Lucy Ricardo from "I Love Lucy" has always been a big inspiration for me, so I would love to walk in her shoes for a day. Lucille made that character wildly successful during a time where it was hard for women to break out into those kind of comedic roles, so to me, she was a true-blue trailblazer.
To be truthful, it's Kesha's entire new album title "." (funny name, but fantastic album!).
I believe that any elected office can be either as entry-level or high-level as you make it. Elected positions should be based on the person running, which does include previous experience in politics... But it also includes other aspects of the person as well, including their political ideology, their community support, and how well they resonate with who they would represent.

This is my first time running for an elected office. I've worked in local government positions before, both as an Assistant for the Meridian Township Election's Office, and as Senior Admin Assistant for Lansing Parks and Recreation. So, I do have experience in some form dealing with local politics. I'm not running to prop myself up, I'm running because I love my community and I want to see it thrive.
Somebody who knows the real constituents they would be representing and understanding their struggles. It's all too often people who run for election and win are distant from the community, focus on solely one portion of the community (ie, the wealthy/"pretty" areas), or have no stake in the community if they lose. In my opinion, it's unfortunate to see somebody who is 2 or 3 tax brackets above the constituents they are being elected to represent runs and wins. This is because it typically means they are very distant from the struggles of living paycheck to paycheck, or having to decide if they can afford their entire grocery list this week, or if they can even pay rent this month.

If I had to boil that entire message down into one sentence: The elected official for Ward 4 should have understanding, empathy and solutions for ALL of their constituents, not just those who can afford to donate to their campaign fund.
Why did everybody laugh when they met the octopus? He gave them ten-tickles.
I believe that anybody running for office should have to submit their finances to a board and to the public for review before being allowed to run. This would include a brief bank account transcript, financial disclosures on stocks/investments/etc, and continued transparency on these things while in office.

I pledge to be fully transparent about my finances during the campaign, and will commit to the above mentioned. I plan on being fully self-funded, or only taking in donations from a grass-roots campaign style of fundraising. In my opinion, this should be an easy baseline for all who run for office, and I as a citizen question those who avoid this conversation.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes