Arizona Protect Marriage, Proposition 107 (2006)
| Voting on Marriage and Family |
|---|
| Ballot Measures |
| By state |
| By year |
| Not on ballot |
| Arizona Constitution |
|---|
| Preamble |
| Articles |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 6.1 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 |
Election results
| Protect Marriage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 775,498 | 51.8% | |||
| Yes | 721,489 | 48.2% | ||
- Election results from Arizona Elections Department.
Text of measure
Ballot language
The language that appeared on the ballot:
| “ |
Analysis by Legislative Council Pursuant to Arizona state statute, marriage between persons of the same sex is void and prohibited. Arizona law does not recognize a marriage contracted in any other state or country that is between two persons of the same sex. Proposition 107 would amend the Arizona Constitution to provide that in order to preserve and protect marriage: 1. Only a union between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage by the State of Arizona or its cities, towns, counties or districts. 2. The State of Arizona and its cities, towns, counties or districts shall not create or recognize a legal status for unmarried persons that is similar to marriage.[2] |
” |
Fiscal Impact Statement
| “ | State law requires the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) Staff to prepare a summary of the fiscal impact of certain ballot measures. Proposition 107 is not projected to have a state cost.[2] | ” |
Funding of the campaigns for and against
Two committees formed to support the measure: "Protect Marriage Arizona," which spent $1,019,143, and "Defend Marriage Arizona," which spent $19,950.
Two committees also formed to oppose the measure: "Arizona Together Opposed," which spent $1,831,504, and "No on 107," which spent $66,189.
Constitutional changes
If Prop 107 had passed in 2006, it would have added this language to the Arizona Constitution:
| “ | To preserve and protect marriage in this state, only a union between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage by this state or its political subdivisions and no legal status for unmarried persons shall be created or recognized by this state or its political subdivisions that is similar to that of marriage.[2] | ” |
Donors opposed
Donors to this group included William Lewis ($715,000), the Human Rights Campaign ($155,055), the Coalition for Progress ($100,000), the Gill Action Fund ($25,000) and Jonathan Lewis ($5,000).
See also
- Marriage and family on the ballot
- Arizona State Senate
- Arizona House of Representatives
- Arizona 2006 ballot measures
- 2006 ballot measures
- List of ballot measures by year
- List of ballot measures by state
- List of Arizona ballot measures
Related measures
Many historical marriage and family-related ballot measures regard the definition of legal marriage. The debate often revolved around whether marriage should be legally defined as the “union of one male and one female” or the “union of two persons [regardless of sex].” Voters chose to define marriage as between “one male and one female” in the following 30 states. The first constitutional prohibition was in 1998, and the latest one occurred in May 2012. All bans on same-sex marriage were overturned in the 2015 United States Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges.
- 1998: Alaska
- 2000: Nebraska
- 2002: Nevada
- 2004: Arkansas
- 2004: Georgia
- 2004: Kentucky
- 2004: Louisiana
- 2004: Michigan
- 2004: Mississippi
- 2004: Missouri
- 2004: Montana
- 2004: North Dakota
- 2004: Ohio
- 2004: Oklahoma
- 2004: Oregon
- 2004: Utah
- 2005: Kansas
- 2005: Texas
- 2006: Alabama
- 2006: Colorado
- 2006: Idaho
- 2006: South Carolina
- 2006: South Dakota
- 2006: Tennessee
- 2006: Virginia
- 2006: Wisconsin
- 2008: Arizona
- 2008: California
- 2008: Florida
- 2012: North Carolina
External links
- Text of the amendment
- Donors for and against Proposition 107
- National Conference of State Legislatures Ballot Measures Database
Footnotes
- ↑ Arizona 2006 election results
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
Arizona elections in 2020 | Voting in Arizona | What's on my ballot? | Elections calendar | Election governance | Ballot access for candidates | Ballot access for parties | Campaign finance requirements | Redistricting |
| Ballot measures |
List of Arizona ballot measures | Local measures | Ballot measure laws | Campaign finance requirements |
| Government |
Who represents me? | Congressional delegation | State executives | State legislature | State Senate | House of Representatives | 2020 legislative session | Largest counties | Largest cities | School districts in Arizona | State constitution |
| Judiciary |
Courts in Arizona | Judicial Selection | Federal courts | Supreme Court | Court of Appeals | Superior Courts | Justice Courts | Municipal Courts |
| Public Policy |
Budget and finances | Energy | Environment | Financial regulation | Healthcare | Immigration | Public education | Public pensions | Taxes |