Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

North Dakota Measure 1, Right to Life of Humans at Any Stage of Development Amendment (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
North Dakota Measure 1
Flag of North Dakota.png
Election date
November 4, 2014
Topic
Abortion
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

North Dakota Measure 1, the Right to Life of Humans at Any Stage of Development Amendment, was on the ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 4, 2014. The ballot measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported amending the North Dakota Constitution to state that "[the] inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected."

A "no" vote opposed amending the North Dakota Constitution to state that "[the] inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected."


Election results

North Dakota Measure 1

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 90,224 35.87%

Defeated No

161,303 64.13%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[1]

Constitutional Measure No. 1
(Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4009, 2013 Session Laws, Ch. 519)

This constitutional measure would create and enact a new section to Article I of the North Dakota Constitution that would state “The inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected.”

YES - means you approve the measure stated above.

NO - means you reject the measure stated above. [2]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article I, North Dakota Constitution

Measure 1 would have added a new section to Article I of the Constitution of North Dakota. The following underlined text would have been added:[3]

The inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected.[2]

Support

North Dakota Choose Life led the campaign in support of Measure 1.[4] Supporters referred to the measure as the Human Life Amendment.[5]

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • North Dakota Family Alliance[7]
  • Concerned Women for America, ND Chapter[7]
  • North Dakota Life League[7]
  • North Dakota Catholic Physicians Group[7]
  • North Dakota Right to Life[7]
  • North Dakota Catholic Radio[7]
  • North Dakota Catholic Conference[7]

Arguments

  • North Dakota Choose Life: "North Dakotans are a just and compassionate people. We recognize that human life is a gift that deserves protection. Similarly, we believe that abortion is morally wrong. Reflecting our values, the Legislature has passed several pro-life laws to protect women and children, including ensuring that women are given full disclosure of information prior to an abortion, making sure parents are notified if their daughter is seeking an abortion, and prohibiting children who are partially born from being killed by an abortionist before their birth can be completed."
  • State Sen. Margaret Sitte (R-35): "This amendment is intended to present a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade. By passage of this amendment, the people of North Dakota are asking government to recognize what science already defined."


Campaign contributions

Supporters had received $585,632 in contributions as of December 3, 2014.[8]

PAC info:

PAC Amount raised Amount spent
North Dakota Choose Life $578,402 $409,879
Yes On 1 $7,230 $6,148
Total $585,632 $416,027

Top 10 contributors:

Donor Amount
North Dakota Catholic Conference $186,000
Wanzek Family Foundation $50,000
George Loegering $50,000
ND Right to Life $30,050
Patricia Pflugrath $25,000
J and P Livestock $25,000
PCS $20,000
Dwight Grotberg $10,250
Gretchen Hoffman $10,000
Ann Dahl $10,000

Opposition

North Dakotans Against Measure 1 led the campaign in opposition to Measure 1.[9]

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

Arguments

  • State Sen. Connie Triplett (D-18): "So long as this proposed amendment does not make some consideration for the life already in existence, of the woman who is carrying the child, that we have no business putting this question before the people of North Dakota."
  • U.S. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D): "Measure 1 will mandate in very strict terms how, and if, North Dakotans get pregnant, how we care for our children, how we care for our elderly or sick family members, and what services can be provided to support all of these stages of our lives."
  • North Dakotans Against Measure 1: "Measure 1 is not a statement of belief. It is a permanent change to our state constitution. When you take a moment to think about it, you will see Measure 1 has real consequences. NDAM 1 believes Measure 1 is poorly written and the unclear language leaves it open to interpretation – leading to more government intrusion into our personal lives. Measure 1 may seem harmless, but it is an extreme and dangerous law. It would have serious unintended consequences if passed. Government should not be interfering in our personal decisions."


Campaign contributions

Opponents had received $824,487 in contributions as of December 3, 2014.[12]

PAC info:

PAC Amount raised Amount spent
North Dakotans Against Measure 1 $815,237 $586,837
North Dakota Students Voting No on 1 $9,250 $2,438
Total $824,487 $589,275

Top 10 contributors:

Donor Amount
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD Action Fund $698,275
Community Action Fund of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties $25,000
Planned Parenthood of Illinois $25,000
The North Dakota Women's Network $12,596
Feminist Majority Foundation $9,250
ACLU-ND $7,154
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah $5,000
Planned Parenthood of Montana $2,875
Steffen and Jan Christensen $2,202
Stephanie Dahl $2,200

Media editorial positions

See also: Endorsements of North Dakota ballot measures, 2014

Opposition

  • Forum Communications Co. said, "Measure 1, the so-called 'personhood amendment' has the distinction of being the most purposefully ambiguous measure ever on a North Dakota ballot. Put there by a misguided and manipulated majority of the Legislature, Measure 1’s seemingly simple and straightforward language is, in effect, an invitation to endless litigation. Moreover, it would allow the heavy hand of government to intrude needlessly into the most personal medical decisions made by families and individuals in consultation with doctors and, if desired, with clergy."[16]
  • Minneapolis Star Tribune said, "It’s unclear at best what the state gains by adding Measure 1’s language to its constitution. In addition, many respected medical providers and organizations have raised legitimate concerns about the amendment’s potential to interfere with personal medical choices, such as end-of-life-care decisions and even fertility treatments. Among the groups opposing the initiative: the North Dakota Medical Association, which represents state doctors."[17]
  • Williston Herald said, "North Dakotans should vote 'No' on Measure 1 and ensure that government and religious authorities remain out of personal medical decisions at the beginning and end of life."[18]

Polls

See also: Polls, 2014 ballot measures
North Dakota Measure 1 (2014)
Poll Favor OpposeUndecidedMargin of errorSample size
University of North Dakota College of Business and Public Administration
9/26/2014 - 10/03/2014
49.9%33.0%17.1%+/-5.0505
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the North Dakota Constitution

In North Dakota, a simple majority vote is required in each chamber of the state Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot.

The constitutional amendment was introduced as Senate Concurrent Resolution 4009 (SCR 4009). On February 7, 2013, the North Dakota Senate passed the resolution.[10] On March 22, 2013, the North Dakota House of Representatives passed the resolution.[19]

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. North Dakota Secretary of State, "Official Ballot Language for Measures Appearing on the Election Ballot," accessed September 4, 2014
  2. 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 North Dakota Legislature, "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4009," accessed January 21, 2014
  4. North Dakota Choose Life, "Homepage," accessed September 2, 2014
  5. North Dakota Choose Life, "About," accessed September 2, 2014
  6. Bismarck Tribune, "Hoevens support Measure 1," September 5, 2014
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 North Dakota Choose Life, "Endorsements," accessed September 2, 2014
  8. North Dakota Secretary of State, "Yes On 1," accessed October 8, 2014
  9. 9.0 9.1 North Dakotans Against Measure 1, "Homepage," accessed September 2, 2014
  10. 10.0 10.1 Reuters, "North Dakota anti-abortion amendment for state ballot clears senate," February 7, 2013
  11. Huffington Post, "North Dakota Republican Pols To Protest Anti-Abortion Laws: 'We Have Stepped Over The Line," March 21, 2013
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 North Dakota Secretary of State, "North Dakotans Against Measure 1," accessed October 8, 2014
  13. The North Dakota Coalition for Privacy in Healthcare, "Homepage," accessed November 12, 2014
  14. Bismarck Tribune, "Church delegates question 'life' ballot measure," June 18, 2014
  15. The Pierce County Tribune, "Libertarian Party opposes Measure 1," September 26, 2014
  16. Jamestown Sun, "Vote ‘no’ on ‘personhood’ amendment," October 7, 2014
  17. Minneapolis Star Tribune, "An attack on abortion rights in North Dakota," October 10, 2014
  18. Williston Herald, "Measure 1: ‘No’ on life amendment," October 24, 2014
  19. Arizona Daily Star, "ND to vote on referendum effectively banning abortions," March 22, 2013