Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Daniel Eismann

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Daniel Eismann
Image of Daniel Eismann
Prior offices
Idaho Supreme Court

Education

Bachelor's

University of Idaho

Law

University of Idaho Law School, 1976


Daniel Eismann was a justice on the Idaho Supreme Court. He was elected to the court in 2000 and took the bench on January 2, 2001. He was re-elected in 2012 for a term that would have expired in January 2019.[1][2] On April 11, 2017, Eismann announced he would retire on August 31, 2017.[3]

Eismann served as chief justice of the court from August 1, 2007, until July 31, 2011. He was succeeded as chief justice by Roger Burdick.

Education

Eismann received his undergraduate degree from the University of Idaho and his J.D. from University of Idaho Law School in 1976.[1]

Career

Following his graduation from law school, Eismann entered private practice for ten years. In 1986, he was appointed a magistrate judge in Owyhee County, Idaho. In 1995, former Governor Phil Batt appointed him to the Ada County District Court. While in this position, Justice Eismann set up the Ada County Drug Court. He presided over this court until late 2000. In 1998, he was elected the administrative district judge for the Idaho 4th Judicial District by his peers. In 2000, Eismann was elected to the Idaho Supreme Court.[1]

Military service

During his undergraduate career Eismann enlisted in the United States Army. From 1967 to 1975, he served two consecutive tours of duty in Vietnam as a crew chief and door gunner on a Huey gunship.[1]

Awards and associations

Awards

  • Purple Heart Ribbon, United States Army, awarded twice for being wounded in combat
  • Commendation Medal, United States Army, awarded three times for heroism [1]

Associations

  • Member, Inn of Court, Boise Chapter
  • Member, National Association of Drug Court Professionals, Stanley M. Goldstein Hall of Fame
  • Former member, Region III Council for Children and Youth
  • Co-founder, Children's Voices, Inc.
  • Co-chair, Idaho Partners Against Domestic Violence
  • Chair, Idaho Drug Court and Mental Health Court Coordinating Committee
  • Former chair, Canyon County Juvenile Justice Task Force
  • Past president, Inns of Court, Boise Chapter
  • Board of directors, Idaho State Bar Lawyers Assistance Program
  • Board of directors, Idaho Law Foundation
  • Board of directors, Conference of Chief Justices
  • Board of directors, Idaho Criminal Justice Commission[1]

Elections

2012

Eismann was re-elected to the Idaho Supreme Court after running unopposed in the primary on May 15, 2012.[4]

See also: Idaho judicial elections, 2012

2006

Idaho Supreme Court, Associate Justice
2006 General election results
Candidates Votes Percent
Daniel Eismann Green check mark transparent.png 118,134 100%
Against retention 0 0%
  • Click here for 2006 General Election Results from the Idaho Secretary of State.

2000

Idaho Supreme Court, Associate Justice
2000 General election results
Candidates Votes Percent
Daniel Eismann Green check mark transparent.png 110,063 58.6%
Cathy Silak 77,658 41.4%
  • Click here for 2000 General Election Results from the Idaho Secretary of State.

Eismann defeated incumbent Cathy Silak, the first time a challenger unseated an incumbent Idaho supreme court justice in 56 years.[5][6]

Noteworthy cases

Political outlook

See also: Political outlook of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Eismann received a campaign finance score of 1.38, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 0.75 that justices received in Idaho.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes