It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!
Raven v. Deukmejian
 |
| State |
| • Laws governing state initiative processes |
| • Laws governing state recall processes |
| • Changes to ballot measure law in 2025 |
| • Analysis of 2025 changes to laws governing ballot measures |
| Local |
| • Laws governing local ballot measures |
| Learn about Ballotpedia's election legislation tracker. |
2026 »
« 2024
|
Raven v. Deukmejian is a 1990 ruling of the California Supreme Court. At issue was a proposed, initiated, amendment to the California Constitution called the "Crime Victims Justice Reform Act" which was intended to limit the rights of criminal defendants to those guaranteed by the federal constitution.[1]
The proposed measure contained a section (Section 3, which would have amended section 24 of Article I of the state Constitution) that provided that certain criminal law rights "shall be construed by the courts of [California] in a manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States" and that the state constitution "shall not be construed to afford greater rights" than those afforded by the federal constitution.
The court determined that the proposal "would have fundamentally changed and subordinated the constitutional role assumed by the judiciary in the governmental process." In other words, the amendment would affect a core function of one of the three branches of government.
The court, noting this, ruled the initiative would have amounted to a revision of the constitution, not an amendment, thereby overturning that section.
Footnotes
