Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Arizona Competitive Elections Reform Act (2008)
Not on Ballot |
---|
![]() |
This measure was not put on an election ballot |
The Arizona Competitive Elections Reform Act was an initiative measure to implement ranked-choice voting using the Schulze method, and less stringent ballot access laws. It also would have mandated that political parties assert their viability every two general election cycles.
Background
This initiated statute was proposed by the $500 threshold committee Arizonans for Competitive Elections Reform in Favor of I-17-2008, and its chairman, McClintock High School student Emerson French as an alternative to Arizona's plurality voting scheme. While a local campaign for ranked-choice voting in Glendale, Arizona, Better Ballot Glendale actively campaigned for a change to that city's charter, French felt the need for statewide reform for elections. The official description of the initiative read, "This initiative aims to make Arizona elections more democratic by instituting ranked-choice voting in races with more than two candidates. This voting method asked voters to rank the candidates in order from the first, most-preferred choice to the least, and can be used for any candidate election. The majority winner of the election is calculated using voter preferences. Due to preferential ranks, no votes are "lost" from one candidate to another, so election results reflect the true wishes of the people. The initiative also makes running easier for qualified candidates so that choices exist for voters."[1]
See also
- Arizona 2008 ballot measures
- Arizona Initiative and Referendum Law
- Campaign finance requirements for Arizona ballot measures
- Petition drive deadlines in 2008
- Arizona signature requirements
External links
- Arizona 2008 Ballot measures
- East Valley Tribune article on the initiative
- Official website for initiative I-17-2008
Footnotes