Nevada Question 6, Appointed Judges' Term of Office Amendment (2002)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nevada Question 6

Flag of Nevada.png

Election date

November 5, 2002

Topic
State judiciary
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



Nevada Question 6 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Nevada on November 5, 2002. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported delaying elections for appointed Supreme Court justices and district judges until they serve at least 12 months, unless appointed within the final year of a 6-year term.

A "no" vote opposed delaying elections for appointed Supreme Court justices and district judges until they serve at least 12 months, unless appointed within the final year of a 6-year term.


Election results

Nevada Question 6

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 192,284 40.78%

Defeated No

279,233 59.22%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Question 6 was as follows:

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to revise the term of office of a Supreme Court justice or district court judge who is appointed to fill a vacancy?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution

A simple majority vote is required during two successive legislative sessions for the Nevada State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 22 votes in the Nevada State Assembly and 11 votes in the Nevada State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.

See also


External links

Footnotes