Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Court dismisses lawsuit against Lehman Brothers Holdings: Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(month category)
m (Text replace - "John Keenan" to "John Keenan")
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[c2010#February|February 3, 2010]]===
===[[c2010#February|February 3, 2010]]===


'''[[New York]]:'''  [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|U.S. District Judge]] [[John Keenan]] dismissed a lawsuit filed against Lehman Brothers Holdings alleging that 11 directors knew that bankruptcy for the bank was imminent and that they did nothing to protect retirement plans for employees.  The action was dismissed because it could not prove that the Lehman Brothers Holdings directors had failed in their duties in managing retirement funds.<ref>[http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/02/03/24351.htm ''Courthouse News Service'' "Judge Tosses Case Against Former Lehman Directors," February 03, 2010]</ref>
'''[[New York]]:'''  [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|U.S. District Judge]] [[John Keenan (New York)|John Keenan]] dismissed a lawsuit filed against Lehman Brothers Holdings alleging that 11 directors knew that bankruptcy for the bank was imminent and that they did nothing to protect retirement plans for employees.  The action was dismissed because it could not prove that the Lehman Brothers Holdings directors had failed in their duties in managing retirement funds.<ref>[http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/02/03/24351.htm ''Courthouse News Service'' "Judge Tosses Case Against Former Lehman Directors," February 03, 2010]</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 15:33, 23 February 2015

February 3, 2010

New York: U.S. District Judge John Keenan dismissed a lawsuit filed against Lehman Brothers Holdings alleging that 11 directors knew that bankruptcy for the bank was imminent and that they did nothing to protect retirement plans for employees. The action was dismissed because it could not prove that the Lehman Brothers Holdings directors had failed in their duties in managing retirement funds.[1]

References