Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Daily Brew: April 17, 2019

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 17, 2019

Get your daily cup of news




%%subject%%

Today's Brew highlights the results of the presidential candidates’ recently-filed FEC reports + a Denver ballot initiative concerning homeless residents  
The Daily Brew

Welcome to the Wednesday, April 17 Brew. Here’s what’s in store for you as you start your day:

  1. Trump and Sanders lead first-quarter presidential fundraising
  2. Opponents of Denver’s “Right to Survive” Initiative outraise proponents by more than 15 to one
  3. Supreme Court’s 2018-2019 term winds down

Trump and Sanders lead first-quarter presidential fundraising

Monday was the deadline for presidential and congressional campaign committees to file financial reports with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for the first three months of 2019. Here’s a breakdown of what this fundraising reporting tells us:

  • President Donald Trump (R) leads all presidential candidates with $30.3 million in receipts.
     
  • Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) follow with $20.7 million, $16.5 million, and $13.2 million, respectively.
     
  • Individual contributions account for $7.3 million of Trump’s total receipts, placing him behind three Democrats in that category. Sanders received $18.2 million in individual contributions, Harris $12.0 million, and former U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas) $9.4 million. South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg rounded out the Top 5 with $7.1 million.

Not all candidates who reported fundraising in excess of $10 million received large-scale support from individual donors. Warren and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) both transferred roughly $10 million raised from previous Senate races to their presidential campaigns. Former U.S. Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) contributed more than $11 million to his own campaign.

The chart below shows individual contributions and total receipts for each presidential candidate in millions of dollars, including small donors, self-funding, and transfers from PACs and political committees:

On Monday, our Ballotpedia Insights webinar with campaign strategists Jeff Roe and Jeff Hewitt featured a fascinating discussion about fundraising, particularly in the context of a presidential campaign. If you missed it, the audio portion of the webinar can be downloaded here, while the full video recording can be found here.

Opponents of Denver’s “Right to Survive” Initiative outraise proponents by more than 15 to one  

This week, voters in Denver will begin receiving ballots in the mail for municipal elections, which include races for mayor, city auditor, city clerk, all 13 city council seats, and two city-wide initiatives. The election takes place May 7.

Initiated Ordinance 300 (I-300), named the “Right to Survive” Initiative by proponents, is one of the initiatives on the ballot. It was designed to allow activities such as sleeping and sheltering oneself in public outdoor places—acts that are currently prohibited by Denver’s unauthorized camping ban, which was passed by the city council in 2012.

As of April 5, groups supporting and opposed to this measure have raised over $1.6 million. “Together Denver - No on 300" reported receiving $1.52 million in donations with top contributors being the Downtown Denver Partnership and the National Association of Realtors, who each contributed $200,000. "Yes On 300 Right To Survive" reported raising $81,514. Its top donor was Kayvan for Denver, the campaign organization of former mayoral candidate Kayvan Khalatbari, which donated $26,196.

Initiative supporters have stated that the existing unauthorized camping law “targets Denver’s homeless, but fails to take into account that there are not enough shelter beds for everyone in need.” The “Yes on 300” campaign website states that I-300 would be a first step toward helping individuals experiencing homelessness sleep, find and hold down jobs, and find housing. Opponents have responded by saying that I-300 would threaten the quality of life for Denver citizens and prohibit officials from enforcing public safety laws. The “No on 300” website also states that the “Right to Survive” Initiative would fail to provide new services or address the causes of homelessness.

The city of Denver stated in an impact report that, if approved, I-300 would be the first initiative of its kind implemented in the nation. I-300 provides a list of rights that specifically concern homeless individuals. Specified rights include “right to rest and shelter oneself from the elements in a non-obstructive manner in outdoor public spaces.” While similar provisions under laws known as the “Homeless Bill of Rights” are codified in Illinois and Rhode Island, among other places, I-300 goes further by proposing to hold the city, county, law enforcement, or any other entity liable if that entity violates the rights listed in the initiative.

Proponents of the “Right to Survive” Initiative submitted over 9,000 signatures to the Denver Elections Division in October 2018 to place I-300 on the ballot. Proponents had also supported a 2014 bill in the state legislature that contained similar provisions, including "the right to use and move freely in public spaces." Though it was reintroduced in 2015, 2016, and 2017, the “Right to Rest Act” never received a vote in the legislature.

Denver voters will also decide Initiated Ordinance 301, which would essentially decriminalize the use and possession of mushrooms containing the psychedelic compound psilocybin by people 21 years of age and older. The measure would not make the production, sale, or distribution of such mushrooms legal, however. If approved, Denver would become the first major city in the country to enact such legislation.

Supreme Court’s 2018-2019 term winds down

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases each on Monday and Tuesday and is scheduled to hear arguments in two cases today. After this week, the court will have heard 65 cases so far this term and has agreed to hear 75 cases. Last term, SCOTUS heard arguments in 69 cases.

Between 2007 and 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States released opinions in 850 cases, averaging between 70 and 90 cases per year.

This week’s cases were:

If those cases sound interesting to you, and if you’re like me and want to learn more about them, click the link below to subscribe to our Bold Justice newsletter with one click for more information on SCOTUS, the confirmation of federal judges, and what is happening in the world of federal courts.


See also