Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Daily Brew: March 20, 2019

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 20, 2019

Get your daily cup of news




%%subject%%

Today's Brew highlights the criteria for candidates to qualify for the Democratic Party’s first debates this summer + a quiz on presidential vetoes  
The Daily Brew

Welcome to the Wednesday, March 20 Brew. Here’s what’s in store for you as you start your day:

  1. What does it take to qualify for the first Democratic presidential primary debates?
  2. Quiz: Which president issued the second most vetoes in our nation’s history?
  3. Supreme Court issues three rulings Tuesday

What does it take to qualify for the first Democratic presidential primary debates?

In the past week, it has been reported that Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Andrew Yang, and several other candidates have all met the criteria to qualify for the initial Democratic presidential primary debates this summer. We’ve been reading all about the various candidates and whether they would qualify for the debates.

With 16 notable Democratic candidates running so far, what does it take to reach the debate stage? We got to wondering—what are the various specifics, and who sets them?

The Democratic National Committee announced last month that a candidate can qualify for the first debate in June based on two factors - polling performance or fundraising from individual donors.

  • Under the first option, a candidate must receive 1 percent support or more in three national or early state polls from a select list of organizations and institutions.
  • Under the second option, a candidate must receive donations from at least 65,000 unique individual donors. Additionally, they must have a minimum of 200 unique donors per state in at least 20 states.

Some candidates have been openly sharing their progress. Marianne Williamson, who is halfway to qualifying, called on her supporters to ask their friends to donate, writing, “You yourself giving me another dollar would not help in this process, but if you make a personal commitment to asking at least one other person to contribute at least one dollar, that will get us over the finish line.”

John Delaney has agreed to donate $2 to charity for every new donor that contributes at least $1 to his campaign.

To follow who else makes it to the debate stage and all the latest news in the 2020 presidential election, sign up for Ballotpedia’s Daily Presidential News Briefing.

#BallotTrivia

Quiz: Which president issued the second most vetoes in our nation’s history?  

In Monday’s Brew, I noted that President Trump issued the first veto of his presidency last Friday. It was the 2,575th veto in U.S. history.

I also highlighted that Franklin Roosevelt, who was the only U.S. president to be elected four times, issued the most vetoes with 635. So, today’s question is, which president has issued the second-most vetoes in our country’s history? I’ll even give a hint – he issued 584 vetoes during his presidency.

Is it:

  1. Woodrow Wilson→
  2. Dwight Eisenhower→
  3. Ulysses S. Grant→
  4. Grover Cleveland→

Supreme Court issues three rulings Tuesday

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued rulings in three cases that were argued before it last fall. The SCOTUS has now issued 20 opinions this term, with 19 cases remaining to be heard and 31 cases for which they have yet to issue an opinion.

Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries

In Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, the Court affirmed a district court ruling that “a product manufacturer has a duty to warn when (i) its product requires incorporation of a part, (ii) the manufacturer knows or has reason to know that the integrated product is likely to be dangerous for its intended uses, and (iii) the manufacturer has no reason to believe that the product’s users will realize that danger.”

The case was brought by the widows of two United States Navy sailors who were exposed to asbestos while they were serving on Navy ships who argued that their husbands developed cancer because of the exposure. The manufacturers had argued that they were not liable for the sailors’ deaths because they did not make or supply the asbestos-containing components.

Justice Kavanaugh wrote the opinion for the 6-3 majority. Justice Gorsuch authored the dissent, which was joined by Justices Thomas and Alito.

Nielsen v. Preap

In Nielsen v. Preap, the Court, in a 5-4 decision, reversed a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling and held that the mandatory detention provision of the Immigration and Naturalization Act still applies to defendants even if they are not detained immediately after being released from criminal custody.

The case involved two plaintiffs who served criminal sentences, were released, and then years later were taken into custody and detained by immigration authorities without bond hearings.

Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, while Justice Breyer’s dissenting opinion was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Since 2007, the Supreme Court has reversed more cases brought to it from the 9th Circuit than any other appeals court. Because SCOTUS has heard more cases originating from that circuit, the reversal rate over that time (75.5 percent) is the fourth-highest of the 13 federal appellate courts.

Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc.

In Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc., the Court affirmed a Washington State Supreme Court ruling that a fuel wholesaler owned by a member of the Yakama Indian Nation was exempt from paying state fuel taxes for using public highways because the Yakama Treaty of 1855 granted members of the Nation the right “to travel upon all public highways,” and preempted its obligation to pay the tax.

The decision was 5-4, with Justice Breyer issuing an opinion supported by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, and Justice Gorsuch writing a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Ginsburg. Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh authored dissenting opinions, which were joined by Justices  Thomas and Alito.


See also