Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Daily Brew: Wisconsin ends judicial deference to agencies

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

June 29, 2018

%%subject%%

Plus Democratic factional conflict update: DCCC is 20 for 22 plus Friday trivia  

Wisconsin Supreme Court ends judicial deference to agencies

The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a decision in Tetra Tech, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue that ended the practice of judicial deference to the statutory interpretations made by administrative agencies in the state. Wisconsin is at least the fifth state to take action addressing judicial deference to agencies at the state level.

In the context of administrative law, judicial deference applies when a court yields to an agency's interpretation of either a statute that the agency administers or a regulation promulgated by the agency. The United States Supreme Court has established several forms of deference in reviewing federal agency actions and many states have developed their own deference practices.

Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Pereira v. Sessions, have raised questions about the future of deference doctrines at the federal level. In Pereira, the court declined to apply Chevron deference—a deference doctrine that instructs federal courts to defer to a federal agency's interpretation of an ambiguous or unclear statute that Congress delegated to the agency to administer. In his concurrence, Justice Anthony Kennedy observed that “it seems necessary and appropriate to reconsider, in an appropriate case, the premises that underlie Chevron and how courts have implemented that decision.”

In his opinion for the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Judge Daniel Kelly wrote, "We have also decided to end our practice of deferring to administrative agencies' conclusions of law. However, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 227.57(10), we will give 'due weight' to the experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge of an administrative agency as we consider its arguments."

In addition to the Wisconsin ruling ending judicial deference, other state examples include the following:

  • The Michigan Supreme Court ended judicial deference to agencies in 2008.

  • Arizona ended the practice through state legislation in April 2018.

  • The Mississippi Supreme Court ended judicial deference to agencies on June 7, 2018.

  • Florida has proposed ending judicial deference to agency interpretations through a constitutional amendment that will appear on the November 6, 2018 ballot.

Learn more

Forward This blank    Tweet This blank blank    Send to Facebook
blank

Democratic factional conflict update: DCCC is 20 for 22

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)-backed candidates have won 20 of 22 primaries where multiple candidates are running and the DCCC issued endorsements before election day.

The two primaries where the DCCC-candidate lost were in Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District, where Kara Eastman defeated Brad Ashford, and New York’s 24th Congressional District, where Dana Balter defeated Juanita Perez Williams.

Currently, nine competitive primaries featuring DCCC candidates remain in 2018.

#FridayFact

Reports are that President Trump will choose a nominee from the same list of 25 judges that produced Neil Gorsuch. What is the average approximate age of all nominees from Trump’s shortlist for Kennedy’s SCOTUS seat? Click your guess: