Daily Brew: November 30, 2020: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Inventory category installation for: On-site_newsletters) |
||
| Line 754: | Line 754: | ||
[[Category:Daily Brew, 2020]] | [[Category:Daily Brew, 2020]] | ||
[[Category:Daily Brew, November, 2020]] | [[Category:Daily Brew, November, 2020]] | ||
[[Category:On-site_newsletters]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 6 August 2021
November 30, 2020
|
States that modified absentee/mail-in voting procedures + lawsuits filed since the Supreme Court's Janus decision  Welcome to the Monday, Nov. 30, Brew.Here’s what’s in store for you as you start your day:
37 states modified absentee/mail-in voting procedures for the Nov. 3 electionNow that election officials are concluding vote tabulation and certifying results from the Nov. 3 election, I thought it would be interesting to step back and review the modifications states made to their absentee/mail-in voting procedures in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty-seven states modified their absentee/mail-in voting procedures for the general election. These modifications can be divided into the following five general categories:
Of the 13 states that did not modify their absentee/mail-in voting procedures, seven are Republican trifectas, four are Democratic trifectas, and one—Kansas—has divided government. Five states—Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah, and Washington—conduct elections primarily by mail. Ballotpedia has tracked 132 lawsuits regarding public-sector union policy since Janus decisionOn Nov. 13, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments in a challenge to Wisconsin's Act 10, a 2011 bill that overhauled the state's public-sector labor laws. And on Nov. 16, the Missouri Supreme Court weighed a challenge to a 2018 bill that made a number of changes to that state's public-sector labor laws. These are just two of the 132 lawsuits Ballotpedia has tracked involving public-sector union policy since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Janus v. AFSCME. In June 2018, the Court ruled 5-4 that public-sector unions cannot compel non-member employees to pay fees covering the costs of non-political union activities. This decision overturned the precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education in 1977. In Abood, the Court had held permitted public-sector unions to collect agency fees to support non-political activities such as collective bargaining efforts and administrative work. At least 58 of the 132 lawsuits involve attempts to obtain refunds for fees that employees had to pay to unions prior to Janus. And at least 57 lawsuits involve challenges to membership withdrawal procedures, that is, laws or policies that allow union members to resign their membership only during specified periods. Of the 132 lawsuits tracked by Ballotpedia, 129 have been filed in federal courts. The largest number of these—55—were filed in the Ninth Circuit, which encompasses federal district courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. The second-largest number of lawsuits—22—have been filed in the Third Circuit, which encompasses Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Want to stay informed about the latest developments in public-sector union policy? Subscribe to Union Station—our weekly newsletter—that tracks legislation, lawsuits, and national trends. Best of all? It’s free! Click here to read previous editions and get this week's issue sent to your inbox.  Today is the last day to have your Ballotpedia donations matched!Last month, a generous supporter presented Ballotpedia with a challenge: if we could raise $50,000 before the general election, those donations would be matched. After quickly meeting that goal, the donor increased the pledge: offering to match all donations in November, up to $100,000! If Ballotpedia has been helpful to you this election season, please consider supporting our work. Today, your donation will go twice as far.
|
