Nevada Question 2, Legislative Open Meetings Amendment (1994)
Nevada Question 2 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Open meetings and public information and State legislatures measures |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Nevada Question 2 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Nevada on November 8, 1994. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported abolishing Senate executive sessions and requiring legislative committee meetings to be open to the public, except for personnel matters. |
A "no" vote opposed abolishing Senate executive sessions and requiring legislative committee meetings to be open to the public, except for personnel matters. |
Election results
Nevada Question 2 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
285,942 | 78.20% | |||
No | 79,699 | 21.80% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Question 2 was as follows:
“ | Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to abolish executive sessions of the Senate and require that all meetings of legislative committees be open to the public, except meetings to consider certain personnel matters? | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution
A simple majority vote is required during two successive legislative sessions for the Nevada State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 22 votes in the Nevada State Assembly and 11 votes in the Nevada State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Nevada Carson City (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |