Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Eatonville School District Levy Replacement (February 2012)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 04:11, 11 August 2021 by Maintenance script (contribs) (Inventory category installation for: Certified_past_date_local_ballot_measures)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Bond elections
2018201720162015
2014201320122011
201020092008
All years and states
Property tax elections
2018201720162015
2014201320122011
201020092008
All years and states
See also
State comparisons
How voting works
Approval rates

An Eatonville School District Levy Replacement measure was on the February 14, 2012 ballot in the Eatonville school district area which is in Pierce and Lewis Counties.

This measure was defeated

  • YES 1,187 (43.48%)
  • NO 1,543 (56.52%)Defeatedd[1]

This measure sought to replace the current school levy which is set to expire with one set at a rate of $4.29 per $1,000 of assessed property value for a further four years in order to pay for general fund maintenance and operational costs in the district.[2]

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

The Board of Directors of Eatonville School District No. 404 adopted Resolution No. 590 concerning a proposition to partially fund the District's educational programs. If approved, Proposition No. 1 would authorize the District to levy the following excess taxes, in place of an expiring levy, on all taxable property within the District, to pay a portion of the District's educational program and operations expenses: Collection Year: 2013-2016; Approximate Levy Rate per $1000 Assessed Value: $4.29; Levy Amount: $4,902,487, $5,147,612, $5,404,992, $5,675,242. All as provided in Resolution No. 590. Should Proposition No. 1 be approved?[3]

Footnotes

  1. Lewis County Elections, Current Election Results (dead link)
  2. Lewis County Elections, Online Voters Guide (dead link)
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.