PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





California Proposition 43, Constitutional Right to Have One's Vote Counted (March 2002)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Proposition 43 2002.PNG
California Proposition 43 was on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot in California as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved.

Proposition 43 amended the California Constitution to explicitly state that every vote cast in accordance with state law shall be counted.

Arguments in support of Proposition 43 by its primary sponsors talked about how in Florida in 2000, votes cast for President were not counted. Proposition 43 was advanced as a way to ensure that what happened in Florida would not be constitutional in California.

Virtually no money was spent either promoting or opposing the ballot measure.[1]

Election results

Proposition 43
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 3,391,678 71.6%
No1,351,17928.4%

Constitutional changes

California Constitution
Articles
IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXAXBXIXIIXIIIXIII AXIII BXIII CXIII DXIVXVXVIXVIIIXIXXIX AXIX BXIX CXXXXIXXIIXXXIVXXXV
Proposition 43 added Section 2.5 to Article II of the California Constitution.

Text of measure

Title

The ballot title was:

Right to Have Vote Counted. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.

Question

The question on the ballot was:

"Should the California Constitution be amended to require that every vote legally cast in an election be counted?"

Ballot summary

The ballot summary prepared by the Attorney General of California said:

Amends Constitution to declare that a voter who casts a vote in an election in accord with the laws of this state shall have that vote counted.

Fiscal impact

See also: Fiscal impact statement

The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said:

"No additional cost to state or local governments."

Argument in favor

Proposition 43's ballot argument was signed by John Longville (Member, California State Assembly), Barbara Inatsugu (President, League of Women Voters of California) and James Knox (Executive Director, California Common Cause). The argument said:

In the 2000 presidential election, confusion over which ballots should or should not count led to a substantial delay in determining which candidate won in Florida. Many votes were not counted due to problems with equipment, questions about whether votes were validly cast, and uncertainty about which candidate some voters had selected.
In an effort to ensure that all votes cast in accordance with Florida law were counted, local election officials began hand recounts of ballots. Those recounts demonstrated that vote tallying machines were less than perfect, and that votes had been missed in the original tally.
Unfortunately, election officials were unable to complete hand counts before a deadline for certifying the state's vote. This deadline fell more than a month before the President was to take office, leaving adequate time to complete hand recounts. Nevertheless, citing this deadline, the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Secretary of State effectively stopped hand counts and certified election results using incomplete vote totals. As a result, thousands of voters did not have their votes counted, even though they cast their votes in accordance with Florida law.

Path to the ballot

The California State Legislature voted to put Proposition 43 on the ballot via Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9 of the 2001-2002 Regular Session (Resolution Chapter 114, Statutes of 2001).

Votes in legislature to refer to ballot
Chamber Ayes Noes
Assembly 79 0
Senate 39 0

See also

External links

References