A. J. ARAVE, WARDEN v. THOMAS E. CREECH (1993)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| A. J. ARAVE, WARDEN v. THOMAS E. CREECH |
|---|
| Term: 1992 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: November 10, 1992 |
| Decided: March 30, 1993 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 7-2 |
| Majority |
| Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas • Byron White |
| Dissenting |
| Harry Blackmun • John Paul Stevens |
A. J. ARAVE, WARDEN v. THOMAS E. CREECH is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 1993. The case was argued before the court on November 10, 1992.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Idaho U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty (cf. extra legal jury influence, death penalty)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Idaho
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 507 U.S. 463
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Sandra Day O'Connor
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
