Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Arizona Proposition 106, Redistricting Commission Amendment (2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Proposition 106

Flag of Arizona.png

Election date

November 7, 2000

Topic
Administration of government and Redistricting policy
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Initiated constitutional amendment
Origin

Citizens



Arizona Proposition 106 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 7, 2000. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported creating a five-member Citizens' Independent Redistricting Commission to draw legislative and congressional district boundaries and removing redistricting authority from the legislature.

A "no" vote opposed creating a five-member Citizens' Independent Redistricting Commission to draw legislative and congressional district boundaries and removing redistricting authority from the legislature.


Election results

Arizona Proposition 106

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

784,272 56.14%
No 612,686 43.86%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Aftermath

Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

On June 29, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. The five-to-four decision upheld the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission as constitutional.[1]

The Arizona Legislature objected to Proposition 106, arguing that the state's independent redistricting commissions violated Section 4 of Article I of the United States Constitution.[2] The legislature claimed that the commission violated the following segment of Section 4: "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."

U.S. District Court

On February 22, 2014, the U.S. District Court for Arizona, in a two-to-one decision, ruled that the state's independent redistricting commission does not violate the federal constitution. The district court's ruling held that Legislature in Section 4 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution refers to the lawmaking process of the state and not legislators specifically.[2]

U.S. Supreme Court

The United States Supreme Court ruled in support of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission on June 29, 2015.[1]

The question presented to the court was:[2]

Does the provision of the Arizona Constitution that divests the Arizona Legislature of any authority to prescribe congressional district lines violate the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution, which requires that the time, place, and manner of congressional elections be prescribed in each state by the “Legislature thereof”?[3]

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the court. Her concluding remark was:

The people of Arizona turned to the initiative to curb the practice of gerrymandering and, thereby, to ensure that Members of Congress would have “an habitual recollection of their dependence on the people.” The Federalist No. 57, at 350 (J. Madison). In so acting, Arizona voters sought to restore “the core principle of republican government,” namely, “that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.” Berman, Managing Gerrymandering, 83 Texas L. Rev. 781 (2005). The Elections Clause does not hinder that endeavor.[3]
—Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 106 was as follows:

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE IV, PART 2, SECTION 1, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; RELATING TO ENDING THE PRACTICE OF GERRYMANDERING AND IMPROVING VOTER AND CANDIDATE PARTICIPATION IN ELECTIONS BY CREATING AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION OF BALANCED APPOINTMENTS TO OVERSEE THE MAPPING OF FAIR AND COMPETITIVE CONGRESSIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE DISTRCITS.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

AMENDING ARIZONA CONSTITUTION TO CREATE A 5-MEMBER "CITIZENS' INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION", WITH NO MORE THAN 2 MEMBERS FROM EACH POLITICAL PARTY AND NO MORE THAN 3 MEMBERS FROM EACH COUNTY, TO DRAW LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFTER EACH U.S. CENSUS; REMOVES REDISTRICTING AUTHORITY FROM THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in Arizona

In Arizona, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 15 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election.

See also


External links

Footnotes