Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Arizona Proposition 202, Local Growth Management Plans Initiative (2000)
| Arizona Proposition 202 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Administration of government |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Initiated state statute |
Origin |
Arizona Proposition 202 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in Arizona on November 7, 2000. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported requiring cities, towns, and counties to submit to voters growth management plans with boundaries to allow for a maximum of 10 years' estimated population growth; limiting rezonings and the extension of water, sewer, and garbage services outside boundaries unless approved by a 4/5ths vote of the governing body plus voter approval; requiring development impact fees to pay the full cost of additional public facility needs; permitting enforcement lawsuits by any person; and repealing other growth management laws. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring cities, towns, and counties to submit to voters growth management plans with boundaries to allow for a maximum of 10 years' estimated population growth; limiting rezonings and the extension of water, sewer, and garbage services outside boundaries unless approved by a 4/5ths vote of the governing body plus voter approval; requiring development impact fees to pay the full cost of additional public facility needs; permitting enforcement lawsuits by any person; and repealing other growth management laws. |
Election results
|
Arizona Proposition 202 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 436,345 | 29.80% | ||
|
|
1,027,674 | 70.20% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 202 was as follows:
| “ | AMENDING TITLE 11, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING CHAPTER 11; AMENDING LAWS 1998, CHAPTER 204, SECTION 1; REPEALING PROPOSITION 303 OF THE 1998 GENERALELECTION, SECTION 1; REPEALING PROPOSITION 303 OF THE1998 GENERAL ELECTION, SECTION 4; AMENDING SECTION 9-461.05, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 9-461.06, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING SECTION 9-461.13, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 9-462.01, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING SECTION 9-463.06, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 11-806.01, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING SECTION 11-809, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES BY ADDING SECTION 11-812; AMENDING SECTION 11-821, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 11-824, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 11-829, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING SECTION 11-833, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 37-331.03, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING SECTION 41-511.23, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; REPEALING SECTION 41-1314, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO STATE CONSERVATION LANDS.
| ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | REQUIRES MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES TO SUBMIT TO VOTERS GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANS AND BOUNDARIES FOR MAXIMUM 10 YEARS' ESTIMATED POPULATION GROWTH; LIMITS REZONINGS AND EXTENDING MUNICIPAL SERVICES OUTSIDE BOUNDARIES UNLESS 4/5THS APPROVAL BY GOVERNING BODY PLUS VOTER APPROVAL; REQUIRES FULL-COST DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES; PERMITS ENFORCEMENT LAWSUITS; REPEALS OTHER GROWTH MANAGEMENT LAWS. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
In Arizona, the number of signatures required for an initiated state statute is equal to 10 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
