Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Arizona Proposition 102, Prohibit Persons in Violation of Federal Immigration Law from Receiving Punitive Damages in Civil Lawsuits Amendment (2006)
Arizona Proposition 102 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Immigration policy and Tort law |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Arizona Proposition 102 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 7, 2006. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting individuals who are in Arizona in violation of federal immigration law from receiving punitive damages in civil lawsuits. |
A "no" vote opposed prohibiting individuals who are in Arizona in violation of federal immigration law from receiving punitive damages in civil lawsuits. |
Election results
Arizona Proposition 102 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
1,102,237 | 74.23% | |||
No | 382,714 | 25.77% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 102 was as follows:
“ | PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE II, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, BY ADDING SECTION 35; RELATING TO STANDING IN CIVIL ACTIONS. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | PROVIDES THAT A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY CIVIL ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Arizona Constitution
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |