Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Burlington, Vermont, Question 5, Ranked-Choice Voting Measure (March 2005)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Burlington Question 5

Flag of Vermont.png

Election date

March 1, 2005

Topic
Local charter amendments and Local elections and campaigns
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral


Burlington Question 5 was on the ballot as a referral in Burlington on March 1, 2005. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported establishing a ranked-choice voting electoral system for mayoral elections.

A "no" vote opposed establishing a ranked-choice voting electoral system for mayoral elections.


Election results

Burlington Question 5

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

4,715 64.46%
No 2,600 35.54%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Question 5 was as follows:

5. CHARTER CHANGE - MAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED FOR POSITION OF MAYOR WITH INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING SYSTEM ADOPTED

“Shall Sections 5 and 22 of the Charter of the City of Burlington, Acts of 1949 No. 298 as amended be further amended to read as follows:

Sec. 5. Election to be by ballot; plurality required for method of election; runoff elections. 

(a) The election of all officers city councilors and school commissioners mentioned in the two (2) proceeding sections shall be by ballot, and the person or persons receiving a plurality of all votes cast for any office aforesaid shall, except as hereinafter provided, be declared elected thereto. However, if no person receives at least forty percent of all votes cast for any office aforesaid, no one shall be declared elected and a runoff election shall be held. The only candidates in the runoff election shall be the two persons receiving the greater number of votes or, in case of a tie, the person(s) receiving the greatest number of votes and or the person(s) receiving the second greatest number of votes. The chief administrative officer shall within seven days warn a runoff election to be held not less than twelve days nor more than twenty days after the date of the warning. The warning shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and posted in a public place. The person or persons receiving a plurality of all the votes cast in a runoff election shall be declared elected.

(b) All elections of mayor shall be by ballot, using a system of instant runoff voting without a separate runoff election. The chief administrative officer shall implement an instant runoff voting protocol according to these guidelines:

(1) The ballot shall give voters the option of ranking candidates in order of preference,

(2) If a candidate receives a majority (over 50%) of first preferences, that candidate is elected.

(3) If no candidate receives a majority of first preferences, an instant runoff re-tabulation shall be performed by the Board of Civil Authority within five (5) business days of the election. The instant runoff re-tabulation shall be conducted in rounds. In each round each voter's ballot shall count as a single vote for whichever continuing candidate he/she has ranked highest. The candidate with the fewest votes after each round shall be eliminated until only two candidates remain, with the candidate then receiving the greatest number of votes being elected.

(4) The city council may adopt additional regulations, consistent with the above, to implement these standards

Sec. 22. Ballots.

For all city or ward elections, and also for the election of justices of the peace in said city, the chief administrative officer shall prepare all official ballots, consistent with the requirements of any ordinance adopted under Section 5 of this charter, and otherwise in the same manner and subject to all the provisions of the laws of this state providing for and regulating the preparation and distribution of official ballots in towns and cities; provided, however, that said chief administrative officer shall cause to be printed for every ward in said city not less than sixty ballots for every fifty names or fractional part thereof on the voting list prepared and posted in such ward for any such election; and further provided that said chief administrative officer shall deliver to the inspectors of election in each ward on the day of such election and before the hour for opening the polls in said ward, such number of blocks of ballots containing one hundred each as shall nearest represent two-thirds of the whole number required to be printed for such ward, and shall retain the balance of the ballots for each ward so prepared.?"

Background

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures
Pages:
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
History of RCV ballot measures
Electoral systems on the ballot
Local electoral systems on the ballot
Electoral systems by state
See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.

Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.

RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.

Local RCV ballot measures

See also: History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.

  • Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
  • There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
  • The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
  • The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.


The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.

Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025
Topic Total Approved Approved (%) Defeated Defeated (%)
  Adopt RCV 72 57 79.2% 15 20.08%
  Repeal RCV 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%
Total 80 61 76.3% 19 23.7%


Path to the ballot

The Burlington City Council voted to place this charter amendment on the ballot.

See also


External links

Footnotes