Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This article is outside of Ballotpedia's coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage scope grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.

Influencer Project Badge.png
This organization is no longer active or there has been no visible activity. Do you have any information or see anything that needs updating? Send a correction to our editors.
California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse
Basic facts
Location:Sacramento, California
Type:PAC
Top official:Shawnda Deane, Principal officer[1]
Founder(s):Shawnda Deane
Year founded:2015
Website:Official website

As of 2019, California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse was a PAC based in Sacramento, California. In 2016, the group opposed the passage of California's Proposition 51, which proposed to fund new schools and improvements on existing schools and was on the November 8 ballot.[2]

Background

The California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse was a coalition that opposed California's Proposition 51. The group stated that it sought to do the following:

Stop the Money Grab of our Children's Public Education Dollars from Private Real Estate Developers who aim to build "new" schools and private charter schools with your tax dollars in sprawling areas probably not even in your own neighborhood.[3]

According to the California Secretary of State filings, the PAC terminated on June 27, 2016.[1]

Political activity

Ballot measure activity

California Proposition 51, Public School Facility Bonds (2016)

See also: California Proposition 51, Public School Facility Bonds (2016)

The long-form ballot summary was as follows:[4]

  • Authorizes $9 billion in general obligation bonds: $3 billion for new construction and $3 billion for modernization of K-12 public school facilities; $1 billion for charter schools and vocational education facilities; and $2 billion for California Community Colleges facilities.
  • Bars amendment to existing authority to levy developer fees to fund school facilities, until new construction bond proceeds are spent or December 31, 2020, whichever is earlier.
  • Bars amendment to existing State Allocation Board process for allocating school construction funding, as to these bonds.
  • Appropriates money from the General Fund to pay off bonds.[3]

The shorter ballot label summary was as follows:[4]

Authorizes $9 billion in general obligation bonds for new construction and modernization of K-12 public school facilities; charter schools and vocational education facilities; and California Community Colleges facilities. Fiscal Impact: State costs of about $17.6 billion to pay off both the principal ($9 billion) and interest ($8.6 billion) on the bonds. Payments of about $500 million per year for 35 years.[3]

The long-form, official ballot summary for Proposition 51 was identical to the initial summary provided to initiative proponents for the purpose of circulating the initiative for signature collection.

California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse was the only PAC registered to oppose Proposition 51, but did not report any contributions or expenditures.[5]

Overview of ballot measure support and opposition

The following table details California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse's ballot measure stances available on Ballotpedia:

Ballot measure support and opposition for California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse
Ballot measure Year Position Amount contributed Status
California Proposition 51, Public School Facility Bonds (2016) 2016 Opposed $0[5]  ApprovedaApproved

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'California Taxpayers and Educators Opposed to Sprawl and Developer Abuse'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes