It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!

Frank Sullivan, Jr.

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is about the justice on the Indiana Supreme Court. If you are looking for information on the Nevada Family Court judge, visit Frank Sullivan.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Frank Sullivan Jr.
Prior offices:
Indiana Supreme Court
Education
Bachelor's
Dartmouth College, 1972
Law
Indiana University-Bloomington School of Law, 1982


Frank Sullivan, Jr. was an associate justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. He was appointed to the court by Governor Evan Bayh and took office on November 1, 1993.[1][2] Sullivan's term would have expired in 2016, but he retired from the court in August 2012.[3] Following his retirement, Sullivan became a professor at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.[4]

Education

Sullivan received his A.B. from Dartmouth College in 1972, his J.D. from Indiana University School of Law at Bloomington in 1982, and his LL.M. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2001.[2]

Professional career

  • 1993-2012: Served on Indiana Supreme Court
  • 1989-1992: Indiana State Budget Director
  • Attorney, private practice
  • Administrative Assistant and Staff Director, Office of Representative John Brademas[5]

Awards and associations

Political outlook

See also: Political outlook of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Sullivan received a campaign finance score of -0.67, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of 0.01 that justices received in Indiana.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[7]

See also

External link

Footnotes