Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Georgia Judicial Nominating Commission

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Judicial nominating commissions
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Individual nominating committees
Select a committee in the dropdown below and click "Submit" to view information about that committee.
Methods of judicial selection
Partisan elections
Nonpartisan elections
Michigan method
Retention elections
Assisted appointment
Bar-controlled commission
Governor-controlled commission
Hybrid commission
Legislative elections
Gubernatorial appointment

The Georgia Judicial Nominating Commission is an independent state commission in Georgia established by executive order in 1972 by former Governor Jimmy Carter (D) that plays a role in the state's judicial selection process. The governor appoints all of the commission's members.[1]

Georgia uses nonpartisan elections to select judges for its state courts, but interim vacancies in the appellate and general jurisdiction courts are filled by the assisted appointment.

The commission is a governor-controlled commission, which means that there is a majority of members chosen by the governor. As of September 10, 2025, 11 states used this type of commission. To learn more about controlling majorities in judicial selection commissions, click here.

Members

Last updated: April 2025

The members of the Georgia Judicial Nominating Commission are appointed by the Governor of Georgia. The executive order establishing the commission states that the appointments to the commission should be "made with a view toward equitable geographic representation and . . reflect the diversity of the State's citizenry." In December 2024, Gov. Brian Kemp (R) named 38 people to the commission.[2][3]

Members of the Georgia Judicial Nominating Commission, April 2025
Name Location
Co-chair Vincent Russo, Esq. Atlanta
Co-chair Mark Middleton, Esq. Atlanta
Co-chair - Hon. Shawn LaGrua Atlanta
Hon. Michael P. Boggs Atlanta
Kristi Connell, Esq. Augusta
Lance Cooper, Esq. Marietta
Tye Darland, Esq. Atlanta
Walter W. Davis, Esq. Atlanta
Sheetal Desai, Esq. Duluth
Hon. Charles E. Evans, Jr. Evans
T. Mills Fleming, Esq. Savannah
Patrick Flynn, Esq. Albany
Robert S. Highsmith, Jr., Esq. Atlanta
Drew Hill, Esq. Athens
Soo Hong, Esq. Marietta
Hon. Jamie Inagawa Fayetteville
Anne Kaufold-Wiggins, Esq. Atlanta
Hon. Benjamin Land Atlanta
Anh Le, Esq. Atlanta
James B. Manley, Esq. Atlanta
Quentin Marlin, Esq. Savannah
Harold D. Melton, Esq. Atlanta
Hon. Shondeana C. Morris Decatur
Brooke Newby, Esq. Perry
Natalie Paine, Esq. Evans
Hon. Samir J. Patel Cartersville
Haynes M. Studstill, Esq. Valdosta
Darrell Sutton, Esq. Marietta
W. Ryan Teague, Esq. Atlanta
Hon. Pythias "Pete" Temesgen Columbus
Frank Turner, Jr., Esq. Covington
Richard Valladares, Esq. Atlanta
Hon. Holly Veal McDonough
Hon. Shannon Wallace Canton
Josh Waters, Esq. Perry
W. Thomas Worthy, Esq. Atlanta

Process

On its website, the commission lays out the following steps for filling a judicial vacancy:[4]

  1. The commission co-chairs notify the commission of the vacancy and set a timetable for the filling of the vacancy.
  2. The co-chairs compile a list of interested applicants.
  3. The co-chairs prepare packets for members of each applicant.
  4. The commission convenes either in person or by phone to interview applicants.
  5. After the interviews, the commission meets to discuss the applicants and make recommendations
  6. The co-chairs submit the list of recommendations to the governor for consideration.
  7. The governor may interview individuals on the list of recommendations.
  8. The governor selects a nominee from the list of recommendations.


The commission has a list of required application materials and its applicant questionnaire available here.

Duties

As of April 2025, the Georgia Judicial Nominating Commission website did not list specific duties for members of the commission.

Control of judicial selection commissions

Assisted appointment is a method of judicial selection in which a nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[5]

At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types, based on the makeup of the judicial nominating commissions. Those types are:

  • Governor-controlled commission - The governor is either responsible for appointing a majority of the members of the nominating commission or may decline to appoint a candidate from a list provided by the nominating commission.
  • Bar-controlled commission - Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the members of the nominating commission.
  • Hybrid - There is no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state Bar Association. The membership of these commissions is determined by different rules in each state.

Twenty-three courts in 22 states used assisted appointment to select state supreme court justices as of June 2021.[6][7] Georgia used a governor-controlled commission. The table below shows the number of courts using each variation of assisted appointment at the state supreme court level.

Assisted appointment methods in state supreme courts
Method Courts (of 23)
Governor-controlled majority 10
Bar-controlled majority 1
Hybrid 12

The map below highlights the states that use each of the three types of assisted appointment.

About judicial selection

Each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they select judges at the state and local level. These methods of selection are:

Election

  • Partisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot alongside a label designating political party affiliation.
  • Nonpartisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot without a label designating party affiliation.
  • Michigan method: State supreme court justices are selected through nonpartisan elections preceded by either partisan primaries or conventions.
  • Retention election: A periodic process whereby voters are asked whether an incumbent judge should remain in office for another term. Judges are not selected for initial terms in office using this election method.

Assisted appointment

  • Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[5] At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types:
    • Bar-controlled commission: Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees that they must choose from.
    • Governor-controlled commission: The governor is responsible for appointing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees they must choose from.
    • Hybrid commission: The judicial nominating commission has no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state bar association. These commissions determine membership in a variety of ways, but no institution or organization has a clear majority control.

Direct appointment

Click a state on the map below to explore judicial selection processes in that state.
http://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_STATE


See also

State courts Appointment methods Election methods
State-Supreme-Courts-Ballotpedia.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Ballotpedia Elections Badge-VOTE.png
State supreme courts
Intermediate appellate courts
Trial courts
Assisted appointment
Court appointment
Gubernatorial appointment
Legislative election
Municipal government selection
Partisan election
Nonpartisan election
Michigan method


External links

Footnotes