Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Kansas City, Missouri, Marijuana Possession Penalty Reduction, Question No. 5 (April 2017)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Local ballot measure elections in 2017
Question 5: Marijuana Possession Penalty Reduction
Kansas City Seal.gif
The basics
Election date:
April 4, 2017
Status:
Approveda Approved
Topic:
Local marijuana
Related articles
Local marijuana on the ballot
April 4, 2017 ballot measures in Missouri
Jackson County, Missouri ballot measures
See also
Kansas City, Missouri

A measure to reduce the punishments for possession of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia was on the ballot for Kansas City voters in Jackson County, Missouri, on April 4, 2017. It was approved.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of limiting the punishment for possession or control of 35 grams or less of marijuana to $25 with no possibility of jail and removing marijuana from the prohibition against drug paraphernalia.
A no vote was a vote against limiting the punishment for possession or control of 35 grams or less of marijuana to $25 with no possibility of jail and removing marijuana from the prohibition against drug paraphernalia.

This initiative was sponsored by a branch of a national group that advocates for marijuana legalization and decriminalization at all levels of government. As such, this initiative forms a key example of a group or corporation advancing a national or statewide agenda at the local level, which is an important narrative for local U.S. politics in 2017.

Initiatives to legalize medical and recreational marijuana at the statewide level were proposed for the 2018 ballot.

Election results

Question 5
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 30,422 74.57%
No10,37625.43%
Election results from Kansas City Elections Office

Overview

Initiative design

Question 5 was designed to establish the following maximum penalties for marijuana possession according to city law:[1]

Amount Jail time Fine
0g to 35g No jail time $25
35g or more 180 days $500

The initiative would also remove marijuana from the list of substances in association with which prohibited drug paraphernalia is defined in city law.

The initiative was not designed to change or supersede prohibitions and penalties established by state law.

Marijuana policy in Missouri

As of 2017, state law imposed the following maximum penalties for possession of marijuana:[2]

Amount Classification Jail time Fine
0g to 10g (first offense) Misdemeanor No jail time $500
0g to 10g (second offense) Misdemeanor 1 year $2,000
More than 10g to 35g Misdemeanor 1 year $2,000
More than 35g to 30 kg Felony 7 years $10,000

Text of measure

Ballot question

The following question appeared on the ballot:[1]

Shall the City of Kansas City limit the authorized punishment that can be imposed in the Municipal Court for the possession or control of 35 grams or less of marijuana to a maximum $25 fine, eliminate jail as a potential punishment for the possession or control of marijuana, and remove marijuana from the prohibition against drug paraphernalia?

[3]

Full text

The full text of the initiative ordinance is available here.

Support

NORML Yes on 5 logo

The Kansas City branch of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) was behind this initiative.[4][5]

Supporters made the following arguments in support of Question 5:[5]

  • it would allow law enforcement to focus on serious issues;
  • the measure would eliminate jail time for marijuana offenses;
  • the measure would help to eliminate discriminatory marijuana arrests.

Kansas City NORML Executive Director Jaime Kacz said, "Once you start talking to people about cannabis reform, you'd be surprised how many people are for it. It doesn't have to be Democrats or liberals, it's Republicans, it's religious people, it's elderly people."[4]

Opposition

Opponents of Question 5 made the following arguments against the initiative:[6]

  • it was badly written and would result in complications and unintended negative effects;
  • marijuana would remain illegal at the statewide level, which means that Question 5 might mislead some people into thinking they could use marijuana without consequences when, in fact, they could still be prosecuted;
  • the measure does not answer enough questions or provide enough details and would be hard to enforce; and
  • the initiative is unnecessary since there aren't very many arrests made for marijuana usage.

The Kansas City Star editorial board wrote the following:[6]

But we think the petition committee is really interested in fully legalizing marijuana. That’s a complex question that should be debated at state and federal levels, not addressed in local ordinances that only nibble around the edges.

Question 5 is a half-solution in search of a half-problem. We recommend a “no” vote at the polls Tuesday.[3]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Missouri

This measure was put on the ballot through a successful citizen initiative petition campaign. Supporters needed to collect valid signatures equal to 5 percent of the votes cast for mayoral candidates in the preceding regular municipal election. This requirement amounted to 1,708 signatures.

The group submitted over 4,000 signatures in November 2016, and on December 1, 2016, the Kansas City clerk's office announced that enough signatures were verified as valid signatures from registered voters to send the initiative to the city council, which needed to approve the measure or put it before voters.[7][8]

On January 19, 2017, the Kansas City Council voted 12-1 to put the measure on the ballot at the election on April 4, 2017. January 19, 2017, was the deadline by which the council had to act to put the measure on the April ballot, with the next available election date in August of 2017.[9]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Kansas City Local marijuana Question No. 5. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes