Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317, Ban on Intoxicating Liquor Imports Initiative (1916)
Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Alcohol laws and Business regulations |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Oregon on November 7, 1916. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported banning the importation of intoxicating liquors from outside of Oregon. |
A "no" vote opposed banning the importation of intoxicating liquors from outside of Oregon. |
Election results
Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
114,932 | 51.17% | |||
No | 109,671 | 48.83% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure Nos. 316-317 was as follows:
“ | Constitutional Amendment - Proposed by Initiative Petition Initiated by Oregon Prohibition State Committee, J. P. Newell, Chairman, 822 Spalding Building, Portland, Oregon; J. Sanger Fox, Executive Secretary, 414 Behnke-Walker Building, Portland, Oregon. - PROHIBITION AMENDMENT FORBIDDING IMPORTATION OF INTOXICATING LIQUORS FOR BEVERAGE PURPOSES - Purpose - This is a constitutional amendment extending the existing constitutional provision, relating to the prohibition of the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquor, by also prohibiting the importation of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes. --- Vote YES or NO. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
The number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment was equal to 8% of the total votes cast in the last Supreme Court justice election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Oregon Salem (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |