Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317, Ban on Intoxicating Liquor Imports Initiative (1916)
| Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 | |
|---|---|
| Election date | |
| Topic Alcohol laws and Business regulations | |
| Status | |
| Type Initiated constitutional amendment | Origin | 
Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Oregon on November 7, 1916. It was approved.
| A "yes" vote supported banning the importation of intoxicating liquors from outside of Oregon. | 
| A "no" vote opposed banning the importation of intoxicating liquors from outside of Oregon. | 
Election results
| Oregon Measure Nos. 316-317 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 114,932 | 51.17% | |||
| No | 109,671 | 48.83% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure Nos. 316-317 was as follows:
| “ | Constitutional Amendment - Proposed by Initiative Petition Initiated by Oregon Prohibition State Committee, J. P. Newell, Chairman, 822 Spalding Building, Portland, Oregon; J. Sanger Fox, Executive Secretary, 414 Behnke-Walker Building, Portland, Oregon. - PROHIBITION AMENDMENT FORBIDDING IMPORTATION OF INTOXICATING LIQUORS FOR BEVERAGE PURPOSES - Purpose - This is a constitutional amendment extending the existing constitutional provision, relating to the prohibition of the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquor, by also prohibiting the importation of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes. --- Vote YES or NO. | ” | 
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
The number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment was equal to 8% of the total votes cast in the last Supreme Court justice election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
|  | State of Oregon Salem (capital) | 
|---|---|
| Elections | What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures | 
| Government | Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy | 
 
					
