Piedmont, California, Measure T, Parcel Tax (March 2020)
Piedmont Measure T | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date March 3, 2020 | |
Topic California parcel tax | |
Status![]() | |
Type Referral | Origin Lawmakers |
A Parcel Tax was on the ballot for Piedmont voters in Alameda County, California, on March 3, 2020.[1] It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to update and continue collecting for four years a special services tax for the city's general fund set to expire on June 30, 2021, with tax rates varying by parcel depending on parcel size and the nature of use, at initial rates between $551 and $930 per parcel for single family residences, $930 to $1,395 per developed commercial parcel, $383 per dwelling unit for multi-family residences, or $565 per parcel for parcels divided by tax code area line. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to update and continue collecting for four years a special services tax for the city's general fund set to expire on June 30, 2021, with tax rates varying by parcel depending on parcel size and the nature of use, at initial rates between $551 and $930 per parcel for single family residences, $930 to $1,395 per developed commercial parcel, $383 per dwelling unit for multi-family residences, or $565 per parcel for parcels divided by tax code area line. |
A two-thirds (66.67%) vote was required for the approval of Measure T.
Election results
Piedmont Measure T |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
4,874 | 82.99% | |||
No | 999 | 17.01% |
Text of measure
Ballot question
The ballot question was as follows:[1]
“ | Shall Ordinance 746 N.S, which maintains essential police, fire, and paramedic services, prevents the reduction in maintenance of City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and prevents the loss of recreational and other public services, by renewing the City of Piedmont's expiring parcel tax for four years, with annual rates depending on use between $551 and $1,395 per parcel, or $383 per dwelling unit, subject to CPI adjustment, raising approximately $2,424,620 annually, be adopted?[2] | ” |
Impartial analysis
The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, city attorney:[3]
|
Full text
The full text of the measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the Piedmont City Council.[1]
See also
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- City of Piedmont, March 3, 2020 Special Municipal Election website
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 City of Piedmont, "March 3, 2020 Special Municipal Election," accessed February 22, 2020
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ City of Piedmont, "City Attorney Impartial Analysis (Municipal Services Special Tax).pdf," accessed February 22, 2020
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |