Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Portland, Oregon, Measure 26-228, Changes to City Governance and Ranked-Choice Voting Measure (November 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Portland Measure 26-228

Flag of Oregon.png

Election date

November 8, 2022

Topic
City governance and Local elections and campaigns
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral

Portland Measure 26-228 was on the ballot as a referral in Portland on November 8, 2022. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this measure to:

  • hire a city administrator, supervised by the mayor, to manage daily operations of the city;
  • expand the city council to 12 members (three from each district);
  • implement ranked-choice voting for city elections; and
  • authorize Independent Salary Commission to set elected officials' salaries.

A "no" vote opposed this measure to change the city's governance structure and implement ranked-choice voting for city elections.


A simple majority was required for the approval of Measure 26-228.

Measure design

Measure 26-228 made three changes to the City Charter.

The first made changes to Portland’s city government structure. The measure provided a City Administrator, supervised by the mayor, to manage daily operations, including hiring, firing, and supervising bureau directors. The mayor was no longer a member of the City Council, but under this measure, they could introduce laws and break tie votes on non-emergency ordinances. The measure provided that salaries of elected officials would be decided by an Independent Salary Commission.

The second expanded the City Council to twelve members. The city was divided into four geographic districts created by the Independent District Commission with three councilors representing each district. Under this measure, the district boundary lines would be adjusted every decade beginning in 2030 based on census population data.

The third established ranked-choice voting that allowed voters to rank candidates in order of preference. Under this measure, primary elections were eliminated. The process for tallying ballots depended on the office. For Mayor and Auditor, if no candidate received over 50% of the votes in the first round, the candidate receiving fewest votes would be eliminated, and that candidate’s votes would be transferred to each voter’s next-highest ranked candidate. The process would then continue until a candidate exceeds a 50% majority. For City Council, candidates would win when they exceeded a threshold set by the number of available positions.

This measure provided that ballots would be counted in rounds. Any candidate exceeding the threshold would be elected, and that candidate's votes above the threshold would be proportionally transferred to other candidates based on voter preference. The candidate receiving the fewest votes in each round would be eliminated, and that candidate’s votes would be transferred to other candidates based on voters’ preferences. The process would then continue for as many rounds as necessary until all positions are filled.

Election results

Portland Measure 26-228

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

164,076 58.10%
No 118,336 41.90%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Measure 26-228 was as follows:

Should Administrator manage city government, 12-member Council (three from each district) make laws, voters elect officials using ranked choice process?

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

Charter Commission's proposal to change structure of Portland city government.

Currently, City Council includes one Mayor and four Commissioners elected citywide. Council makes laws; Mayor and Commissioners directly manage bureaus. Voters choose one candidate per office in citywide primary elections with runoff elections if necessary. If measure is approved:

• City Administrator, supervised by Mayor, manages daily operations, including hiring, firing, and supervising bureau directors • Council expanded to twelve members; City divided into four geographic districts created by Independent District Commission; three Councilors elected to represent each district • Council makes laws. Mayor may introduce laws, vote to break ties on non-emergency ordinances • Independent Salary Commission sets elected officials' salaries • City elections use "ranked choice voting" process that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference instead of casting a single vote; primary elections eliminated. For citywide offices (Mayor, Auditor), votes tallied in rounds until single candidate receives majority. For Councilors, votes tallied and reallocated in rounds until three candidates in each district meet election threshold. • Cost estimate: $900,000 to $8.7 million annually

• Includes other provisions

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

Portlanders for Charter Reform led the campaign in support of the measure. Portlanders for Charter Reform was supported by Building Power for Communities of Color.[1]

Supporters

Organizations

  • Portland United for Change


Arguments

  • Raahi Reddy, charter commissioner: “What we risk by not moving forward is to continue along this dysfunctional path that we have been on … in the big picture and the grand scheme of things, I think you’re going to see we are going to be a better city because of these reforms.”
  • Melanie Billings-Yun, charter commissioner: “There was a huge demand for district representation, especially from the east side,” Billings-Yun said. “People 82nd and above felt that they had all of these issues and no one cared. People were caring about the trash in Old Town, but no one cared about the huge amount of trash they were experiencing, and the potholes and the street racing.”


Opposition

Partnership for Common Sense Government and the Ulysses PAC were two organizations in opposition to the measure.[1]

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • Portland Business Alliance


Arguments

  • State Rep. Rob Nosse (D-42): “It does not read like the candidates who get the most votes win. I think that is a recipe for suspicion and mistrust. How votes are counted and who wins must be straightforward, especially in a rank choice system.”
  • Kathleen Saadat, civil rights leader: “There’s not much that addresses the functions of government and where the complaints are, and how one resolves those problems that exist in the interaction between government and the people who are governed … I want to see more of that design for improved government regardless. If we send everyone into a room where it’s not functional, it’s no more functional just adding people there.”


Background

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures
Pages:
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
History of RCV ballot measures
Electoral systems on the ballot
Local electoral systems on the ballot
Electoral systems by state
See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.

Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.

RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.

Local RCV ballot measures

See also: History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.

  • Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
  • There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
  • The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
  • The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.


The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.

Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025
Topic Total Approved Approved (%) Defeated Defeated (%)
  Adopt RCV 72 57 79.2% 15 20.08%
  Repeal RCV 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%
Total 80 61 76.3% 19 23.7%


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Oregon

The Portland Charter Review Commission is a 20-person group, appointed by the City Council, to review the City Charter and recommend changes. This occurs every 10 years.

On June 14, 2022, the Portland Charter Review Commission voted 17-3 to refer the measure to the ballot. The measure required 15 out of 20 votes to go to voters on the ballot.

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Oregon

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Oregon.

How to vote in Oregon

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 WWEEK.com, "Two Political Action Committees Plan to Push Back Against Portland Charter Reform Ballot Measure" June 28, 2022
  2. 2.0 2.1 Oregon Secretary of State, “Voting in Oregon,” accessed April 20, 2023
  3. Deschutes County Oregon, “Voting in Oregon FAQ,” accessed April 20, 2023
  4. Oregon.gov, "Public Elections Calendar, November 2024," accessed January 9, 2024
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Online Voter Registration," accessed April 20, 2023
  6. Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Voter Registration Card," accessed November 2, 2024
  7. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."