Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

South Carolina House advances bill opposing ESG (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
ESG - Teal - D2.jpg
Environmental, social, and corporate governance
ESG Icon 200x200.png

What is ESG?
Enacted ESG legislation
Arguments for and against ESG
Opposition to ESG
Federal ESG rules
ESG legislation tracker
Economy and Society: Ballotpedia's weekly ESG newsletter
See also: Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)

April 18, 2023

A bill in South Carolina that would require the state pension system to consider only pecuniary factors in its investments and to exercise its shareholder proxy rights has passed the state House and moves now to the Senate:

[I]n South Carolina, the state’s House of Representatives passed the ESG Pension Protection Act. The bill requires South Carolina’s retirement system to consider only “pecuniary factors” when making investment decisions and prevents it from considering ESG factors.

The bill would also require the state’s retirement system to exercise shareholder proxy rights for shares that are owned directly or indirectly on behalf of the system. To accomplish this, the retirement system would have to manage the proxy voting in-house, hire an external proxy adviser or fully delegate the proxy voting to an external investment manager.

According to a fiscal analysis of the bill by the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office, managing the proxy voting could cost the retirement system as much as $1 million if it does it in-house. It would cost the system $292,000 to hire an external proxy adviser, and delegating the proxy voting to an external investment manager would be of no cost to the retirement system. The report added that the retirement system is not sure which of the three scenarios would fulfill the requirements of the bill.[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.