Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Spokane, Washington, Proposition 1, Prohibit Encampments Near Childcare Facilities, Schools, and Parks Initiative (November 2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Spokane Proposition 1

Flag of Washington.png

Election date

November 7, 2023

Topic
Local housing and Local law enforcement
Status

OverturnedOverturned

Type
Initiative


Spokane Proposition 1 was on the ballot as an initiative in Spokane on November 7, 2023.

The initiative was approved and later overturned by a 2025 state supreme court ruling.

A "yes" vote supported prohibiting encampments on any public property or within 1,000 feet from the perimeter of a park, childcare facility, or a public or private school.

A "no" vote opposed prohibiting encampments on any public property or within 1,000 feet from the perimeter of a park, childcare facility, or a public or private school.


Aftermath

Supreme Court ruling, 2025

A lawsuit filed by Jewels Helping Hands against initiative sponsor Brian Hansen alleged that the initiative was beyond the scope of the local initiative process, arguing that it was administrative rather than legislative.

Hansen argued that the initiative was legislative because it added a "new policy for the ... protection of places where children gather from the documented harms that are associated with encampments in ... Spokane" rather than administratively alter existing policy.

On April 15, 2025, the Washington Supreme Court ruled, "The scope of the local initiative power is more limited than the scope of the constitutional, statewide initiative power. As mentioned above, under our controlling precedent, a local initiative exceeds its proper scope if it covers a topic that is 'administrative' rather than 'legislative' in nature. The Hansen Initiative 'administer[s] the details' of Spokane’s preexisting policy approach to camping. For that reason, it falls on the administrative, rather than the legislative, side of the line. A local initiative that falls on the administrative side of the line exceeds the proper scope of the local initiative power."[1]

Election results

Spokane Proposition 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

52,253 74.68%
No 17,715 25.32%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Measure design

The initiative was designed to prohibit encampments at all times, regardless of whether or not shelter space is available, in the following places:[2]

  • on any public property;
  • on conservation lands and natural areas along the Spokane River, Latah Creek, and tributaries;
  • at any place where camping may pose a danger to any person, an immediate threat or risk of arm to public health or safety, or a disruption to government services;
  • within 1,000 feet from the perimeter of a park, childcare facility, or a public or private school;
  • underneath or within 50 feet of a railroad viaduct in the Spokane Police Department's Downtown Precinct; and
  • within three blocks of a congregate shelter as long as signs are posted stating that camping is prohibited.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 1 was as follows:

Shall the Spokane Municipal Code be amended to prohibit encampments within 1,000 feet of any public or private school, public park, playground, or licensed child care facility?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

Clean & Safe Spokane sponsored the initiative.[3]

Supporters

Individuals

  • Larry Stone - Developer and owner of L.B. Stone Properties


Arguments

  • Clean & Safe Spokane: "We are fighting for commonsense policies to protect our neighborhoods and ensure our community thrives. Our number one priority is addressing the safety of our children. Homeless encampments negatively affect our neighborhoods and businesses, but most importantly endanger the lives of our children. Our children deserve to feel safe and parents deserve to know that their kids are being protected. This is why we are taking the initiative to make sure any camping, such as what we saw at Camp Hope, will not occur within 1,000 feet of a school or public playground. The families in our community deserve better, and we are fighting to give them better."
  • Initiative sponsor Brian Hansen: "While this initiative was not drafted solely with homeless encampments in mind, one only has to read the several sworn affidavits filed as part of the City’s nuisance litigation against the Department of Transportation to be concerned with the incredibly inappropriate and unacceptable things that children were exposed to in the area surrounding Camp Hope."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • Jewels Helping Hands


Arguments

  • Former Spokane City Council President Ben Stuckart and homeless advocacy group Jewels Helping Hands, filers of a lawsuit to remove the initiative from the ballot: "While the initiative’s sponsors are impatient for action on homelessness, as are we all, the Initiative could undermine the significant action that is already underway. For example, the city and its regional partners are working towards creating a regional homelessness authority, but such regional action would become impossible if the voters of any one jurisdiction could utilize the initiative process to undermine regional decision-making and cooperation."
  • Spokane City Council President Lori Kinnear: "Our existing laws are more than adequate and defensible. I don’t think this law will be defensible."


Path to the ballot

This measure was put on the ballot through an initiative petition sponsored by Spokane attorney Brian Hansen. On July 10, 2023, the Spokane County Elections Office found that of the 4,769 signatures submitted by proponents, 2,713 were valid. To qualify for the ballot, 2,624 valid signatures were required.[4]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Washington

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Washington.

How to vote in Washington


See also

Footnotes

  1. Cascade PBS, "WA Supreme Court strikes down Spokane camping ban initiative," accessed April 15, 2025
  2. Spokane County, "Proposition 1 full text," accessed August 18, 2023
  3. Clean & Safe Spokane, "Home," accessed August 18, 2023
  4. Spokane City, "July 31, 2023, city council agenda," accessed August 18, 2023
  5. Washington Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions on Voting by Mail,” accessed April 20, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 Washington Secretary of State, "Voter Eligibility," accessed April 20, 2023
  7. Washington State Legislature, "Voter registration deadlines," accessed April 20, 2023
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 The Hill, "Wash. gov signs universal voter registration law," March 20, 2018
  9. Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State Voter Registration Form," accessed November 2, 2024
  10. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  11. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.40.160," accessed October 9, 2025