Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County

| Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County | |
| Docket number: 25-170 | |
| Term: 2026 | |
| Court: United States Supreme Court | |
| Important dates | |
| Pending | |
| Court membership | |
| Chief Justice John Roberts • Clarence Thomas • Samuel Alito • Sonia Sotomayor • Elena Kagan • Neil Gorsuch • Brett Kavanaugh • Amy Coney Barrett • Ketanji Brown Jackson | |
Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County is a case scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court of the United States during the court's October 2026-2027 term.
2. Whether this court has statutory and Article III jurisdiction to hear this case."[1]
The case came on a writ of certiorari to the Colorado Supreme Court. To review the lower court's opinion, click here.
Background
Case summary
The following are the parties to this case:[2]
- Petitioner: Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al.
- Legal counsel: Kannon K. Shanmugam (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP)
- Respondent: County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.
- Legal counsel: Kevin K. Russell (Russell & Woofter LLC), Marco Benjamin Simons (Law Office of Marco B. Simons)
The following summary of the case was published by Oyez, a free law project from Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, Justia, and the Chicago-Kent College of Law:[3]
| “ |
Boulder County and the City of Boulder (collectively, "Boulder") sued Exxon Mobil Corporation and three Suncor Energy entities, alleging that the companies' decades-long production, promotion, refining, marketing, and sale of fossil fuels knowingly drove climate change and caused concrete harm to Boulder's property and residents. Boulder further alleges that the defendants compounded this harm by intentionally misleading the public about fossil fuels' role in accelerating climate change. The alleged injuries include flood damage, increased wildfire risk, drought, and physical damage to public buildings and infrastructure—costs Boulder claims it has absorbed and will continue to absorb. To recover those costs, Boulder asserts state common law claims for public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, unjust enrichment, and civil conspiracy. Critically, Boulder seeks only monetary damages—not an injunction against fossil fuel operations or any form of emissions regulation. The defendants argue that these state-law claims are precluded because federal law—specifically the Clean Air Act, the federal common law of interstate pollution, and the federal foreign affairs power—occupies the field and bars state courts from adjudicating harms rooted in interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions. Boulder filed suit in state court; the defendants removed the case to federal court, but after extensive litigation that included appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and two certiorari petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the remand order and the case returned to the Boulder County District Court, which denied the defendants' motion to dismiss on preemption grounds. The defendants then petitioned the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado for extraordinary review under C.A.R. 21, which that court accepted and resolved in Boulder's favor on May 12, 2025.[4] |
” |
To learn more about this case, see the following:
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Oyez
- SCOTUSblog
- Legal Information Institute - Clean Air Act (CAA)
Timeline
- January 26, 2026: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
- August 8, 2025: Suncor Energy Inc. appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- May 12, 2025: The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court and remanded the case to the district court.
Questions presented
The petitioner presented the following questions to the court:[1]
Questions presented:
|
Oral argument
Audio
Audio of the case will be posted here when it is made available.
Transcript
A transcript of the case will be posted here when it is made available.
Outcome
The case is pending adjudication before the U.S. Supreme Court.
October term 2026-2027
The Supreme Court will begin hearing cases for the term on October 5, 2026. The court's yearly term begins on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October the following year. The court generally releases the majority of its decisions by mid-June.[5]
See also
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- U.S. Supreme Court docket file - Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County (petitions, motions, briefs, opinions, and attorneys)
- SCOTUSblog case file for Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Supreme Court of the United States, "25-170 SUNCOR ENERGY INC. V. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BOULDER COUNTY QP", February 23, 2026
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "No. No. 25-170 Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County" accessed March 25, 2026
- ↑ Oyez, "Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County", accessed March 25, 2026
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ SupremeCourt.gov, "The Supreme Court at Work: The Term and Caseload," accessed January 24, 2022