Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Washington Referendum 20, Abortion Legalization to Four Months Measure (1970)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Washington Referendum 20
Flag of Washington.png
Election date
November 3, 1970
Topic
Abortion
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
State statute
Origin
State legislature

Washington Referendum 20, the Abortion Legalization to Four Months Measure, was on the ballot in Washington as a legislatively referred state statute on November 3, 1970. The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported legalizing abortion for women "not quick with child" and within the "four lunar months after conception."

A "no" vote opposed the ballot measure, thus keeping the then-existing law that prohibited abortion except in cases to preserve the mother's life.


Overview

What did Referendum 20 change about abortion law in Washington?

Referendum 20 legalized abortion for women "not quick with child" and within the "four lunar months after conception." Prior to Referendum 20, abortion was a criminal offense in Washington, except in cases to preserve the mother's life.[1]

The ballot measure required that before an abortion could be performed, a married woman's husband must consent or a woman's parents must consent when she is unmarried and under the age of 18. Under Referendum 20, a woman must have also resided in the state for at least 90 days before an abortion could be performed.[1]

Election results

Washington Referendum 20

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

599,959 56.49%
No 462,174 43.51%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[1]

An act permitting the termination of pregnancy when performed: (1) By or under the supervision of a licensed physician; (2) within four lunar months after conception upon a woman not quick with child who has resided in this state for at least ninety days prior to termination; (3) with the woman's consent and that of her husband, if she is residing with him, or if unmarried and under eighteen years of age, with her consent and that of her legal guardian; and providing that no objecting hospital, physician or other person shall be required to participate in a termination of pregnancy.[2]

Support

Arguments

  • Dr. Thomas Reed of the Committee for Referendum 20: “The present restrictive abortion law uses one extreme moral viewpoint for its basis. Referendum 20 will allow all of us to exercise our moral beliefs and will protect the privacy of the individual. No woman will be forced to have an abortion and no physician will be forced to perform the operation.”
  • State Sen. Joel Pritchard (R), State Rep. Lois North (R), and State Rep. David Sprague (D): "The decision to bear children is a basic human right. No law or government should be able to tell you whether or not you must bear a child. ... Women who have money can safely and legally leave our state and obtain abortions elsewhere. Girls and women who don't have the economic means resort to back-alley or self-inflicted abortions. Many are permanently crippled. Contraception sometimes fails. ... Let's put an end to a cruel and hypocritical law — vote for abortion reform."


Opposition

Arguments

  • Virginia Huber of Voice for the Unborn: “Young women carrying a child for whom they do not want to be responsible seldom give simplistic reasons for their predicament. An unwanted pregnancy is the result of many factors, social, environmental and emotional. And the answer to that problem is never solved by destroying the baby.”
  • State Sen. Robert Ridder (D), State Rep. Margaret Hurley (D), and lawyer A. John Nicholson: "The solution to unwanted children lies not in killing the child. Birth control, family planning and education all provide reasonable alternatives. We are making strong progress with these and other humane solutions now. Referendum 20 would halt this progress. … Common sense dictates that under the provision dealing with medical emergency it will increase "back room" abortions, not prevent them. Fathers can be deprived of their rights. Read the bill carefully. Society must hold all human life sacred or no life is safe."


Path to the ballot

Referendum 20 was a legislatively referred state statute. A simple majority vote was required in both chambers of the Washington State Legislature.

The ballot measure was introduced into the Legislature as Senate Bill 68 (SB 68). The Washington State Senate passed SB 68 on January 30, 1970. The Washington House of Representatives passed the bill on February 4, 1970.[1]

See also


Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State 1970 Voter Guide," accessed May 17, 2022
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.