Wisconsin Question 1, State Supreme Court Justices Amendment (April 1889)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wisconsin Question 1

Flag of Wisconsin.png

Election date

April 2, 1889

Topic
State judiciary
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



Wisconsin Question 1 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Wisconsin on April 2, 1889. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the constitution to provide for the state supreme court to be made up of five justices.

A "no" vote opposed amending the constitution to provide for the state supreme court to be made up of five justices.


Election results

Wisconsin Question 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

125,759 89.53%
No 14,712 10.47%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Question 1 was as follows:

For amendment to the constitution...

Against amendment to the constitution...


Constitutional changes

Article VII, Section 4
SECTION 1. The chief justice and associate justices of the supreme court shall be severally known as justices of said court with the same terms of office, respectively as now provided. The supreme court shall consist of five justices (any three of whom shall be a quorum), to be elected as now provided. The justice having been longest a continuous member of the court (or in case two or more of such senior justices having served for the same length of time, then the one whose commission first expires), shall be ex-officio the chief justice;

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Wisconsin Constitution

A simple majority vote is required during two legislative sessions for the Wisconsin State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 50 votes in the Wisconsin State Assembly and 17 votes in the Wisconsin State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.

See also


Footnotes