Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Workers Compensation Claim of Decker v. State of Wyoming

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This Ballotpedia article needs to be updated.
This Ballotpedia article is currently under review by Ballotpedia staff as it may contain out-of-date information. Please email us if you would like to suggest an update.



Litigation.png

This Open Records and Transparency Project article is a sprout. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by expanding this article.

Workers Compensation Claim of Deckervs.State of Wyoming
Number: 191 P.3d 105, 2008 WY 100
Year: 2008
State: Wyoming
Court: Wyoming Supreme Court
Other lawsuits in Wyoming
Other lawsuits in 2008
Precedents include:
This case established that the definition of public body which includes bodies created by statute requires direct legislative enactment, not merely permissive legislation which leaves the creation of bodies at the discretion of an executive offices.[1]
Sunshine Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Deliberative Process Exemption


Workers Compensation Claim of Decker v. State of Wyoming was a case before the Wyoming Supreme Court in 2008 concerning the application of open meetings laws to medical examination boards which determine workers compensation claims.

Important precedents

This case established that the definition of public body which includes bodies created by statute requires direct legislative enactment, not merely permissive legislation which leaves the creation of bodies at the discretion of an executive offices.[1]

Background

  • Daniel Decker, a sheet metal worker, was denied workers compensation for alleged claims that his work with sheet metal had aggravated a wrist condition.
  • Decker appealed the decision on multiple levels, and was again denied.
  • Decker filed a suit, alleging the appeal hearings violated both the due process law and the Wyoming Public Meetings Act because they failed to contact him and allow him to be present at the hearing.[1]

Ruling of the court

The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Medical Commission hearing panel. The court determined that the panel did not fall under the definition of body in the public meetings law because the hearings panels were not created directly by statute, but indirectly by decisions of a particular state office. In addition, the impermanent nature of the panels removes them from the scope of the law. Finally, the legislatures allowance of up to 45 days for the Medical Commission's decision indicates that it in no way meant to restrict deliberations to predetermined open meetings. Based on these decisions, the court ruled that the Medical Commission had not violated the public meetings law.[1]

Associated cases

See also

  • Wyoming Public Meetings Act


External links

Footnotes