Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Charles Borth: Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
(Remove local judicial categories)
 
Line 45: Line 45:
[[Category:Appointed judges, June 2018]]
[[Category:Appointed judges, June 2018]]
[[Category:Kim Reynolds, District Court]]
[[Category:Kim Reynolds, District Court]]
[[category:Iowa district court judges, District Three]]
[[Category:Term expiring 2019]]
[[Category:Term expiring 2019]]
<!--2010 categories-->
<!--2010 categories-->

Latest revision as of 19:03, 1 October 2024


Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


Charles K. Borth

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Iowa District Three
Tenure
Present officeholder
Prior offices
Iowa District Court 3A Associate Judge

Elections and appointments
Appointed

2018

Education

Bachelor's

Mankato State University

Law

Drake University

Charles K. Borth is a judge on the Third District of Iowa. He was appointed in June 2018 by Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds.[1]

Borth previously was a district associate judge of Iowa District 3A. He was appointed to this position in 2009. Borth was retained to a full six-year term in the 2010 general election. He was retained again in the general election on November 8, 2016.[2]

Biography

Borth graduated from Mankato State University with a B.A. in 1992 and earned a J.D. from Drake University in 1995.[3]

He was a law clerk in Iowa District Three from 1995 to 1997. Following his clerkship, Borth served Clay County as an assistant attorney and worked for the Spencer law firm Zenor & Houchins.[4] Zenor & Houchins made Borth a partner in 2004, changing its name to Zenor, Houchins & Borth.[4][5]

Elections

2016

See also: Iowa local trial court judicial elections, 2016

Fifty-nine Iowa District Court judges sought retention in the general election on November 8, 2016.[6]

Charles Borth was retained in the Iowa District 3A, District Court Associate Judge Charles Borth Retention Election with 72.88% of the vote.

Iowa District 3A, District Court Associate Judge Charles Borth Retention Election, 2016
Name Yes votes
Green check mark transparent.pngCharles Borth72.88%
Source: Iowa Secretary of State, "November 8, 2016, General Election: Judicial," accessed November 9, 2016

2010

See also: Iowa judicial elections, 2010

Borth was retained on November 2, 2010, with 59.82 percent of the vote.[2]

Noteworthy events

In 2005, the Iowa Supreme Court Disciplinary Board filed three counts of alleged misconduct against Borth. In 2003, while Borth was serving as an assistant county attorney, his father was charged with a violation of a municipal ordinance. Borth entered a not guilty plea on his father's behalf and negotiated the disposition of the case. During the period from 1998 to 2004, Borth also negotiated approximately 74 misdemeanor traffic charges down to lesser, nonmoving violations.[7]

The Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission found that Borth's actions violated state ethics rules against providing criminal defense work while serving as a county attorney or assistant county attorney, instituting criminal charges that are known not to be supported by probable cause, and including unauthorized charitable donation requirements in negotiated plea bargains. The commission recommended that he receive a public reprimand.[7]

The Iowa Supreme Court concurred with both of the commission's conclusions, agreeing that Borth had violated the ethics rules and that a public reprimand was the appropriate response.[7] They noted that Borth "has had no other ethical violations, enjoys a good reputation in the legal community, and cooperated fully with the Board during its investigation."[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes