Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Oklahoma transparency legislation

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 06:02, 27 June 2025 by Janie Valentine (contribs) (→‎2009)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Sunshine Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Deliberative Process Exemption

This article is outside of Ballotpedia's coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage scope grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.

This page covers legislation related to transparency in government proposed in Oklahoma.

2009

  • State Representatives Murphey and Brogdon authored House Bill 1032[1] which "would put all transactions made with state purchasing cards on the Web every month. Since each transaction would include the amount spent and what it was spent on, it would provide much more information to taxpayers about how their money is being spent. It also would force state agencies to allow renewal of licenses or permits online, saving time for consumers and paperwork for the agency."[2]
  • House Representative John Carey (D-Durant) proposed House Bill 1049[3] that "seeks to clarify that police should make incident reports available to the public, even if there are no arrests." Executive vice president of the Oklahoma Press Association Mark Thomas is in favor of the bill since "the way some local police jurisdictions have interpreted the law, no incident reports are required unless someone is taken into custody." He said in some circumstances, that essentially permits “secret police actions” with no public accounting, and making it clear that incident reports are required could solve the problem.[4] HB1049 has passed the House, and moves to the Senate for further debate.[5]
  • The Oklahoma House of Representatives Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee is considering a bill that would allow the chief medical examiner to withhold the public release of autopsy reports at the request of a district attorney or law enforcement agency if the records may impede an ongoing criminal investigation.[6]

Footnotes