Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Wisconsin Supreme Court asked to reinstate voter identification law

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 16:26, 7 June 2016 by Maintenance script (contribs) (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Judicial Update

August 22, 2012

Wisconsin: The law that would require voters to have a government-issued photo ID to be able to vote could find itself again in a Wisconsin courtroom. Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen has asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to put the law into effect for the November election.[1]

Attorney General Hollen said, “While I respect the judicial process and the right to challenge a law in court, it is time for our Supreme Court to take control of these cases.”[1]
Wisconsin
Attorney Lester Pines, a lawyer for the League of Women Voters, compared the Attorney General's move to a "hail Mary pass," saying "I don’t think the Supreme Court is going to be interested in taking this case up at the last minute.”[1]

In March this year two judges ruled against the law, Judge David Flanagan issued a temporary injunction and Judge Richard Niess a permanent injunction. Both judges agreed that the Voter ID law would impair citizens right to vote.[2][3]


Read more about previous rulings on the Wisconsin voter ID law


See also

Footnotes