Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Vermont state budget (2012-2013)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 13:40, 10 March 2017 by Jerrick Adams (contribs) (Text replacement - "{{tnr}}" to "{{Archive budget timestamp|Year=2013}}{{tnr}}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Note: This article was last updated in 2013. Click here for more recent information on state budgets and finances.

The state faced a $50 million gap between revenues and expenditures, one of the smaller gaps in the past few years. The state had set aside $13 million in the Agency of Human Services caseload reserve, $3.9 million for revenue shortfalls and $1.9 million for federal cuts. There was also $3 million in unanticipated revenue coming from the attorney general’s settlement with big banks.[1]

The budget bill as enacted can be accessed here.

Legislative proposed budget

The House passed a $5.01 billion state budget with a vote of 99-41.[2] The budget spent about $124 million on recovery from Tropical Storm Irene.[3] Gov. Peter Shumlin said he believed the House budget adhered to the priorities of his proposed budget.[2]

The total budget spent 6.4 percent more than the fiscal year 2012 state budget.[4] The general fund accounted for $1.3 billion of the overall spending plan and under the House budget general fund spending would have increase 5.8 percent over fiscal year 2012.[4] The transportation budget, which was up by more than $103 million, saw the highest dollar increase.[3]

New spending in the budget included:[4]

  • $20.5 million to make up for a cut in federal support for Medicaid;
  • $14 million to cover the increasing costs of government employee retirement programs;
  • $13.6 million in pay increases for current state employees;
  • $6 million to make up for dwindling payments under the state's share of a settlement reached between states and the tobacco industry 15 years ago.

Surplus

The House's budget plan took a new approach to a state surplus, should there be one, and devoted half of any surplus to the state education fund to help reduce property taxes, and a quarter each to a newly established rainy day fund and to money set aside to offset federal cuts.[4][3]

Revenues

Prior to considering the budget bill, the House had already passed revenue-generating legislation — namely a fee bill for the Department of Motor Vehicles that increased rates for driver’s licenses and vehicle registrations, a one penny increase to the statewide property tax and a provision that would push surplus funds toward the General Fund transfer to the Education Fund to make up for $27.5 million in “rebasing” that would have a three-cent impact on local property taxpayers.

Governor's proposed budget

The governor's budget recommendations can be accessed here.

Footnotes