Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Amarillo, Texas, Proposition A, Local Abortion Policies Initiative (November 2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Amarillo Proposition A

Flag of Texas.png

Election date

November 5, 2024

Topic
Local abortion
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Initiative


Amarillo Proposition A was on the ballot as an initiative in Amarillo on November 5, 2024. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:

  • declare that the City of Amarillo is a Sanctuary City for the Unborn;
  • declare that abortion is illegal in Amarillo, except when performed to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency;
  • provide that abortion-inducing drugs are unlawful contraband;
  • prohibit city residents from receiving abortions in other jurisdictions to the extent constitutionally permissible;
  • prohibit people from transporting city residents to a place outside Amarillo to receive an abortion;
  • designate organizations that use mail to send items intended for abortions as criminal organizations and prohibit them from operating in Amarillo; and 
  • provide that private persons have standing to bring civil actions against persons who violate or intend to violate this law.

"no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to designate Amarillo as a Sanctuary City for the Unborn and enact specific city regulations and restrictions on abortion.


    Election results

    See also: Results for abortion-related ballot measures, 2024

    Amarillo Proposition A

    Result Votes Percentage
    Yes 27,579 40.54%

    Defeated No

    40,442 59.46%
    Results are officially certified.
    Source


    Overview

    What was Proposition A designed to do?

    Proposition A was designed to declare that Amarillo is a Sanctuary City for the Unborn, and amend the Amarillo Code of Ordinances to provide that it will be unlawful for any person to procure or perform an abortion of any type and at any state of pregnancy in Amarillo, Texas, except when performed to save the life of the pregnant woman in a medical emergency. Under the measure, it would have been unlawful for any person to aid or abet an abortion in the city. It would have banned the manufacturing, possession, or distribution of abortion-inducing drugs, including mifepristone and misoprostol.[1]

    The measure would have prohibited city residents from receiving abortions in other jurisdictions to the extent constitutionally permissible and prohibited people from transporting city residents to a place outside Amarillo to receive an abortion. It would have designated organizations that use mail to send items intended for abortions as criminal organizations and prohibit them from operating in Amarillo. The measure was designed to make it unlawful to transport the remains of a fetus or unborn child that was terminated by an elective abortion, or to dispose of those remains in Amarillo. The measure would have also provided that private persons have standing to bring civil actions against persons who violate or intend to violate this law.[1]

    Text of measure

    Ballot title

    The ballot title for Proposition A was as follows:

    The Code of Ordinances of the City Of Amarillo, Texas shall be amended to adopt an initiated ordinance, submitted by the Amarillo Sanctuary City for the Unborn Citizen Initiative Petition Initiating Committee, declaring the City of Amarillo a sanctuary city for the unborn; declaring that abortion at all times and at all stages of pregnancy is unlawful unless an abortion is performed to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency; finding that abortion-inducing drugs are declared contraband and it shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, possess, or distribute abortion-inducing drugs in the City of Amarillo; prohibiting abortions within the City of Amarillo; prohibiting abortions on City of Arnarillo residents; prohibiting abortion trafficking of an unborn child; prohibiting abortion-inducing drugs in the City of Amarillo; prohibiting any organization that violates 18 U.S.C. Sections 1461 or 1462 by facilitating abortions from operating or doing business in the City of Amarillo; prohibiting the transportation or disposal in the City of Amarillo Of the remains of an unborn child killed by an abortion; providing a private right of action; providing for affirmative defenses; providing for severability and providing an effective date.

    Full Text

    The full text of this measure is available here.


    Support

    Amarillo Sanctuary City for the Unborn Citizen Initiative Petition Committee and Project Destiny Amarillo were the campaigns in support of the initiative.[2]

    Supporters

    Organizations

    • Right to Life East Texas

    Arguments

    • Project Destiny Amarillo: "The core intention of the ordinance is simple: to protect the most vulnerable among us - unborn children. This ordinance aims to prevent the organized transportation of pregnant women across state lines specifically for elective abortions, while ensuring the rights of these women are fully respected. This is balanced enforcement. The ordinance respects individual creeds and ensures that the ordinance is applied fairly and justly. It does not involve invasive measures such as checkpoints or traffic stops. It protects pregnant women. Expectant mothers are explicitly protected from being sued for traveling to obtain an abortion. The anti-trafficking component of the ordinance takes a stand for ethical considerations and the protection of unborn children, while ensuring that women’s rights and freedoms are upheld. It is a balanced approach that seeks to address a complex issue thoughtfully and responsibly."

    Opposition

    Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance led the campaign in opposition to the initiative.[3]

    Opponents

    Organizations

    • Women's March

    Arguments

    • Women's March: "Prop A is an unnecessary and dangerous ordinance that seeks to make Amarillo a ‘Sanctuary City for the Unborn.’ In reality, it threatens reproductive healthcare access, targets healthcare providers, and opens the door for extreme, expensive legal actions in Amarillo. We stand firmly against Prop A because it is a clear overreach of government power, has no place in any city, and is part of a larger out-of-town extremist push to criminalize abortion care nationally."
    • Amarillo City Council member Tom Scherlen: "I’m totally pro-life, but I’m not pro this ordinance because this ordinance has a lot of government overreach … Neighbor sues neighbor, and nothing happens on this law unless the baby is dead already. So, what you’re doing, you’re putting a law into effect that does nothing to save the baby’s life."


    Path to the ballot

    See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Texas

    The Amarillo Sanctuary City for the Unborn Citizen Initiative Petition Committee submitted more than 10,300 signatures on April 25, 2024. On May 16, 2024, the secretary’s office found 6,300 of the submitted signatures valid, and on May 28, the petition was presented to the city council. The Amarillo City Council rejected the ordinance on July 11, 2024. On June 29, 2024, the initiative committee submitted a statement to the city secretary certifying the intent to present the proposed ordinance to voters. The Amarillo City council voted to place the initiative on the ballot on July 9, 2024.

    How to cast a vote

    See also: Voting in Texas

    See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

    How to vote in Texas


    See also

    Footnotes

    1. 1.0 1.1 Amarillo Texas, "Ordinance," accessed October 5, 2024
    2. Project Destiny Amarillo, "Homepage," accessed October 5, 2024
    3. Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance, "Homepage," accessed October 5, 2024
    4. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
    5. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
    6. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
    7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
    8. Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
    9. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    10. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
    11. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
    12. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
    13. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
    14. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
    15. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
    16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content