Analysis of spending in America's largest cities (2014-2015)
City finance survey Using the data Spending per citizen Spending per leader |
As of April 2015, the country's 100 largest cities by population spent an average of $2,605 per citizen in the most recent fiscal year for which reports were available. This number is 49.74 percent of the average amount spent in the states where those cities are located. Those same cities' council members have $152 million of spending power on average, which is 25.90 percent of the $589 million in spending power that legislators in those same states possess.[1]
Editor's note: Because city budgets are produced on a rolling schedule, the budgets referenced below are not all from the same fiscal year. Data in this report comes from both the 2014 and 2015 fiscal years.
Overview
Quick facts
Spending per citizen
Average city budget in the largest 100 cities:
- $2.146 billion
Average state budget in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $79.590 billion
Average spent per citizen in the largest 100 cities:
- $2,605
Average spent per citizen in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $5,237
Median city budget in the largest 100 cities:
- $800 million
Median state budget in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $44.9 billion
Median spent per citizen in the largest 100 cities:
- $2,031
Chart 1 depicts the average amount spent per citizen for the largest 10 U.S. cities by population, not including New York City.
Median spent per citizen in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $5,107
Colorado Springs spends the least per citizen of the largest 100 cities at $566. Washington, D.C., spends $15,624 per citizen, nearly $6,000 more than the next highest city. That means, on average, Washington, D.C., spends 27.6 times more per citizen than Colorado Springs.
Six cities—San Francisco, Seattle, Scottsdale, New York City, Long Beach and Austin—spent more per citizen on average than the states in which they are located.
Chart 2 depicts the cities with the three highest and three lowest amounts spent per citizen, not including New York City, along with the average from the 100 largest cities.
Spending per leader
Average city budget in the largest 100 cities:
- $2.146 billion
Average state budget in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $79.590 billion
Average spent per city council member in the largest 100 cities:
- $153 million
Average spent per legislator in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $589 million
Chart 3 depicts the six cities that spend more money per citizen than their states.
Median city budget in the largest 100 cities:
- $800 million
Median state budget in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $44.9 billion
Median spent per city council member in the largest 100 cities:
- $91 million
Median spent per legislator in a state with one of the largest 100 cities:
- $340 million
Council members in Madison have the least spending power of any of their counterparts in the largest 100 cities, having only $13.75 Million in spending power per member. Each of New York City's council members have a spending power of $1,431 Million. Each member of New York City's council, therefore, has 104.1 times more spending power than one of Madison's leaders.
Seven cities—Portland, New York City, Seattle, Honolulu, Phoenix, Boise and Las Vegas—give their council members more spending power on average than the state legislators elected in their state.
Chart 4 depicts the seven cities where the average city council member has more money to spend than the average state legislator.
City finance survey
A National League of Cities survey of city finance officers in 2014 found that although tax revenues increased, a combination of decreased state and federal aid, and heightened obligations in areas such as pensions, healthcare and wages continued to burden city budgets. In spite of this, the survey reported that 80 percent of the finance officers believed their cities were better able to meet fiscal needs than in 2013, the highest percentage in the survey's 29-year history.
These finance officers reported that items causing the budget to decrease the most from 2013 to 2014 were federal aid and state aid, with tax base a distant third. Meanwhile, infrastructure, service costs and employee wages were reported to be the most common reason for budget increases between the two years
In terms of actual impact on the budget, officials surveyed cited the tax base and health of the local economy as having the most positive effect on the city budget. A handful of factors were deemed to have the most negative impact: service costs, infrastructure, pensions, health benefits and employee wages.
To increase revenue, 43 percent of finance officers stated that their city raised fee levels in 2014. Twenty-two percent of cities raised their property tax rate, while 18 percent reported increasing the number of fees attached to city services.
But where have those funds gone? The survey found that city expenditures increased most in the areas of wages (76 percent of cities), public safety (69 percent) and infrastructure (62 percent). Education and contracting were the two categories reported to increase the least across cities surveyed.
During the recession from December 2007 to June 2009, a number of cities cut personnel costs through a combination of hiring freezes, layoffs and reduction in health benefits. Now, for the first time since 2008, more cities have increased (33 percent) rather than decreased (18 percent) their number of employees.
Using the data
The data in the tables below is useful for comparing cities of similar size and within the same region to see how factors such as the tax rate and services provided vary from city to city. For example:
- Birmingham, Alabama - Population: 212,113. Budget: $390 million.
- Baton Rouge, Louisiana - Population: 229,426. Budget: $819 million.
Separated by only 300 miles, these two southeastern cities have a difference in population of less than 20,000. Baton Rouge, however, has double the annual budget of Birmingham. Does this extra funding come directly from the population in the form of taxes and administrative fees, or from outside sources such as state and federal assistance? Does the much higher amount spent per citizen ($3,570 to $1,839) mean that people in Baton Rouge enjoy services that are either much better or much more plentiful than residents of Birmingham?
Spending per citizen comparison
The following table details the amount of money spent per citizen in the largest 100 cities and their states. The column "City % of State" compares the amount spent per citizen at the city level as a percent of the amount spent per citizen at the state level.
City | State | Comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
City | State | Budget | Population | $ Per Citizen | Budget | Population | $ Per Citizen | City % of State | Which is Higher? |
Albuquerque[2] | NM | $893M | 556,495 | $1,605 | $16,200M | 2,086,895 | $7,763 | 20.67% | State |
Anaheim[3] | CA | $1,600M | 345,012 | $4,638 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 80.54% | State |
Anchorage[4] | AK | $471M | 300,950 | $1,565 | $11,600M | 737,259 | $15,734 | 9.95% | State |
Arlington[5] | TX | $490M | 379,577 | $1,291 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 34.22% | State |
Atlanta[6] | GA | $533M | 447,841 | $1,190 | $41,400M | 9,994,759 | $4,142 | 28.73% | State |
Aurora[7] | CO | $591M | 345,803 | $1,710 | $30,300M | 5,272,086 | $5,747 | 29.76% | State |
Austin[8] | TX | $3,500M | 885,400 | $3,953 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 104.78% | City |
Bakersfield[9] | CA | $418M | 363,630 | $1,150 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 19.96% | State |
Baltimore[10] | MD | $1,648M | 622,104 | $2,649 | $37,300M | 5,938,737 | $6,281 | 42.18% | State |
Baton Rouge[11] | LA | $819M | 229,426 | $3,570 | $28,800M | 4,629,284 | $6,221 | 57.38% | State |
Birmingham[12] | AL | $390M | 212,113 | $1,839 | $23,900M | 4,833,996 | $4,944 | 37.19% | State |
Boise[13] | ID | $487M | 214,237 | $2,273 | $7,300M | 1,612,843 | $4,526 | 50.22% | State |
Boston[14] | MA | $2,700M | 645,966 | $4,180 | $56,900M | 6,708,874 | $8,481 | 49.28% | State |
Buffalo[15] | NY | $482M | 258,959 | $1,861 | $134,000M | 19,695,680 | $6,804 | 27.36% | State |
Chandler[16] | AZ | $783M | 249,146 | $3,143 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 72.15% | State |
Charlotte[17] | NC | $2,100M | 792,862 | $2,649 | $43,800M | 9,848,917 | $4,447 | 59.56% | State |
Chesapeake[18] | VA | $923M | 230,571 | $4,003 | $44,700M | 8,270,345 | $5,405 | 74.07% | State |
Chicago[19] | IL | $7,300M | 2,700,000 | $2,704 | $70,400M | 12,890,552 | $5,461 | 49.51% | State |
Chula Vista[20] | CA | $269M | 256,780 | $1,048 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 18.21% | State |
Cincinnati[21] | OH | $358M | 297,517 | $1,203 | $59,100M | 11,572,005 | $5,107 | 23.56% | State |
Cleveland[22] | OH | $1,470M | 390,113 | $3,768 | $59,100M | 11,572,005 | $5,107 | 73.78% | State |
Colorado Springs[23] | CO | $249M | 439,886 | $566 | $30,300M | 5,272,086 | $5,747 | 9.85% | State |
Columbus[24] | OH | $814M | 822,553 | $990 | $59,100M | 11,572,005 | $5,107 | 19.38% | State |
Corpus Christi[25] | TX | $772M | 316,381 | $2,440 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 64.68% | State |
Dallas[26] | TX | $2,800M | 1,200,000 | $2,333 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 61.85% | State |
Denver[27] | CO | $1,490M | 649,495 | $2,294 | $30,300M | 5,272,086 | $5,747 | 39.92% | State |
Detroit[28] | MI | $2,600M | 688,701 | $3,775 | $51,200M | 9,898,193 | $5,173 | 72.98% | State |
Durham[29] | NC | $390M | 245,475 | $1,588 | $43,800M | 9,848,917 | $4,447 | 35.72% | State |
El Paso[30] | TX | $801M | 674,433 | $1,188 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 31.50% | State |
Fort Wayne[31] | IN | $182M | 256,496 | $710 | $27,300M | 6,570,713 | $4,155 | 17.08% | State |
Fort Worth[32] | TX | $1,500M | 792,727 | $1,892 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 50.15% | State |
Fremont[33] | CA | $238M | 224,922 | $1,058 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 18.38% | State |
Fresno[34] | CA | $977M | 509,924 | $1,916 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 33.27% | State |
Garland[35] | TX | $629M | 234,566 | $2,682 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 71.09% | State |
Gilbert[36] | AZ | $554M | 229,972 | $2,409 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 55.31% | State |
Glendale[37] | AZ | $576M | 234,632 | $2,455 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 56.36% | State |
Greensboro[38] | NC | $472M | 279,639 | $1,688 | $43,800M | 9,848,917 | $4,447 | 37.95% | State |
Henderson[39] | NV | $482M | 270,811 | $1,780 | $8,730M | 2,791,494 | $3,127 | 56.91% | State |
Hialeah[40] | FL | $257M | 233,394 | $1,101 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 29.32% | State |
Honolulu[41] | HI | $2,100M | 347,884 | $6,036 | $11,800M | 1,408,987 | $8,375 | 72.08% | State |
Houston[42] | TX | $5,200M | 2,100,000 | $2,476 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 65.63% | State |
Indianapolis[43] | IN | $938M | 843,393 | $1,112 | $27,300M | 6,570,713 | $4,155 | 26.77% | State |
Irvine[44] | CA | $144M | 236,716 | $608 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 10.56% | State |
Irving[45] | TX | $300M | 228,653 | $1,312 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 34.78% | State |
Jacksonville[46] | FL | $1,060M | 842,583 | $1,258 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 33.50% | State |
Jersey City[47] | NJ | $500M | 257,342 | $1,943 | $53,100M | 8,911,502 | $5,959 | 32.61% | State |
Kansas City[48] | MO | $1,400M | 467,007 | $2,998 | $23,200M | 6,044,917 | $3,838 | 78.11% | State |
Laredo[49] | TX | $556M | 248,142 | $2,241 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 59.39% | State |
Las Vegas[50] | NV | $1,077M | 603,488 | $1,785 | $8,730M | 2,791,494 | $3,127 | 57.06% | State |
Lexington[51] | KY | $540M | 308,428 | $1,751 | $28,800M | 4,399,583 | $6,546 | 26.75% | State |
Lincoln[52] | NE | $159M | 268,738 | $592 | $10,500M | 1,868,969 | $5,618 | 10.53% | State |
Long Beach[53] | CA | $3,100M | 469,428 | $6,604 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 114.68% | City |
Los Angeles[54] | CA | $8,100M | 3,800,000 | $2,132 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 37.02% | State |
Louisville[55] | KY | $750M | 609,893 | $1,230 | $28,800M | 4,399,583 | $6,546 | 18.79% | State |
Lubbock[56] | TX | $675M | 239,538 | $2,816 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 74.64% | State |
Madison[57] | WI | $275M | 243,344 | $1,130 | $44,900M | 5,742,953 | $7,818 | 14.45% | State |
Memphis[58] | TN | $618M | 653,450 | $946 | $32,100M | 6,497,269 | $4,941 | 19.14% | State |
Mesa[59] | AZ | $1,300M | 457,587 | $2,841 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 65.22% | State |
Miami[60] | FL | $523M | 417,650 | $1,252 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 33.35% | State |
Milwaukee[61] | WI | $590M | 599,164 | $985 | $44,900M | 5,742,953 | $7,818 | 12.59% | State |
Minneapolis[62] | MN | $1,200M | 400,070 | $2,999 | $35,400M | 5,422,060 | $6,529 | 45.94% | State |
Nashville[63] | TN | $1,800M | 634,464 | $2,837 | $32,100M | 6,497,269 | $4,941 | 57.42% | State |
New Orleans[64] | LA | $505M | 378,715 | $1,333 | $28,800M | 4,629,284 | $6,221 | 21.43% | State |
New York[65] | NY | $73,000M | 8,400,000 | $8,690 | $134,000M | 19,695,680 | $6,804 | 127.73% | City |
Newark[66] | NJ | $800M | 278,427 | $2,873 | $53,100M | 8,911,502 | $5,959 | 48.22% | State |
Norfolk[67] | VA | $1,100M | 246,139 | $4,469 | $44,700M | 8,270,345 | $5,405 | 82.69% | State |
North Las Vegas[68] | NV | $492M | 226,877 | $2,169 | $8,730M | 2,791,494 | $3,127 | 69.34% | State |
Oakland[69] | CA | $2,000M | 400,740 | $4,991 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 86.67% | State |
Oklahoma City[70] | OK | $1,100M | 610,613 | $1,801 | $22,100M | 3,853,118 | $5,736 | 31.41% | State |
Omaha[71] | NE | $800M | 434,353 | $1,842 | $10,500M | 1,868,969 | $5,618 | 32.78% | State |
Orlando[72] | FL | $934M | 255,483 | $3,656 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 97.36% | State |
Philadelphia[73] | PA | $4,500M | 1,550,000 | $2,903 | $86,200M | 12,781,296 | $6,744 | 43.05% | State |
Phoenix[74] | AZ | $3,500M | 1,500,000 | $2,333 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 53.57% | State |
Pittsburgh[75] | PA | $488M | 305,841 | $1,596 | $86,200M | 12,781,296 | $6,744 | 23.66% | State |
Plano[76] | TX | $492M | 274,409 | $1,793 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 47.52% | State |
Portland[77] | OR | $3,600M | 609,456 | $5,907 | $28,300M | 3,928,068 | $7,205 | 81.99% | State |
Raleigh[78] | NC | $754M | 431,746 | $1,746 | $43,800M | 9,848,917 | $4,447 | 39.27% | State |
Reno[79] | NV | $359M | 233,294 | $1,539 | $8,730M | 2,791,494 | $3,127 | 49.21% | State |
Riverside[80] | CA | $894M | 316,619 | $2,824 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 49.03% | State |
Sacramento[81] | CA | $819M | 479,686 | $1,707 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 29.65% | State |
San Antonio[82] | TX | $2,400M | 1,400,000 | $1,714 | $100,000M | 26,505,637 | $3,773 | 45.44% | State |
San Bernardino[83] | CA | $258M | 213,708 | $1,207 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 20.97% | State |
San Diego[84] | CA | $3,000M | 1,330,000 | $2,256 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 39.17% | State |
San Francisco[85] | CA | $7,900M | 837,442 | $9,433 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 163.82% | City |
San Jose[86] | CA | $3,000M | 998,537 | $3,004 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 52.17% | State |
Santa Ana[87] | CA | $430M | 334,227 | $1,287 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 22.34% | State |
Scottsdale[88] | AZ | $1,300M | 226,918 | $5,729 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 131.53% | City |
Seattle[89] | WA | $4,400M | 652,405 | $6,744 | $34,300M | 6,973,742 | $4,918 | 137.12% | City |
St. Louis[90] | MO | $985M | 318,416 | $3,094 | $23,200M | 6,044,917 | $3,838 | 80.62% | State |
St. Paul[91] | MN | $516M | 294,873 | $1,748 | $35,400M | 5,422,060 | $6,529 | 26.78% | State |
St. Petersburg[92] | FL | $483M | 249,688 | $1,934 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 51.52% | State |
Stockton[93] | CA | $632M | 298,118 | $2,120 | $221,300M | 38,431,393 | $5,758 | 36.82% | State |
Tampa[94] | FL | $830M | 352,957 | $2,352 | $73,600M | 19,600,311 | $3,755 | 62.62% | State |
Toledo[95] | OH | $650M | 282,313 | $2,302 | $59,100M | 11,572,005 | $5,107 | 45.08% | State |
Tucson[96] | AZ | $1,265M | 526,116 | $2,404 | $28,900M | 6,634,997 | $4,356 | 55.20% | State |
Tulsa[97] | OK | $597M | 398,121 | $1,500 | $22,100M | 3,853,118 | $5,736 | 26.14% | State |
Virginia Beach[98] | VA | $1,800M | 448,479 | $4,014 | $44,700M | 8,270,345 | $5,405 | 74.26% | State |
Washington, D.C.[99] | - | $10,100M | 646,449 | $15,624 | - | - | - | - | - |
Wichita[100] | KS | $577M | 386,552 | $1,493 | $14,700M | 2,895,801 | $5,076 | 29.40% | State |
Winston-Salem[101] | NC | $379M | 236,441 | $1,603 | $43,800M | 9,848,917 | $4,447 | 36.03% | State |
Spending per leader comparison
The following table details the spending power of city council members and state legislators in the largest 100 cities and their states. The column "City % of State" compares the amount spent per council member at the city level as a percent of the amount spent per legislator at the state level.
City | State | Comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
City | State | Budget | City Council Size | $ Per Council Member | Budget | Legislators | $ Per Legislator | City % of State | Which is Higher? |
Albuquerque[2] | NM | $893M | 9 | $99M | $16,200M | 112 | $145M | 68.60% | State |
Anaheim[3] | CA | $1,600M | 5 | $320M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 17.35% | State |
Anchorage[4] | AK | $471M | 11 | $43M | $11,600M | 60 | $193M | 22.15% | State |
Arlington[5] | TX | $490M | 9 | $54M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 9.85% | State |
Atlanta[6] | GA | $533M | 16 | $33M | $41,400M | 236 | $175M | 18.99% | State |
Aurora[7] | CO | $591M | 11 | $54M | $30,300M | 100 | $303M | 17.74% | State |
Austin[8] | TX | $3,500M | 7 | $500M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 90.50% | State |
Bakersfield[9] | CA | $418M | 8 | $52M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 2.83% | State |
Baltimore[10] | MD | $1,648M | 15 | $110M | $37,300M | 188 | $198M | 55.38% | State |
Baton Rouge[11] | LA | $819M | 12 | $68M | $28,800M | 144 | $200M | 34.13% | State |
Birmingham[12] | AL | $390M | 9 | $43M | $23,900M | 140 | $171M | 25.38% | State |
Boise[13] | ID | $487M | 6 | $81M | $7,300M | 105 | $70M | 116.75% | City |
Boston[14] | MA | $2,700M | 13 | $208M | $56,900M | 200 | $285M | 73.00% | State |
Buffalo[15] | NY | $482M | 9 | $54M | $134,000M | 213 | $629M | 8.51% | State |
Chandler[16] | AZ | $783M | 7 | $112M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 34.83% | State |
Charlotte[17] | NC | $2,100M | 12 | $175M | $43,800M | 170 | $258M | 67.92% | State |
Chesapeake[18] | VA | $923M | 9 | $103M | $44,700M | 140 | $319M | 32.12% | State |
Chicago[19] | IL | $7,300M | 50 | $146M | $70,400M | 177 | $398M | 36.71% | State |
Chula Vista[20] | CA | $269M | 5 | $54M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 2.92% | State |
Cincinnati[21] | OH | $358M | 9 | $40M | $59,100M | 132 | $448M | 8.88% | State |
Cleveland[22] | OH | $1,470M | 17 | $86M | $59,100M | 132 | $448M | 19.31% | State |
Colorado Springs[23] | CO | $249M | 9 | $28M | $30,300M | 100 | $303M | 9.13% | State |
Columbus[24] | OH | $814M | 7 | $116M | $59,100M | 132 | $447M | 25.97% | State |
Corpus Christi[25] | TX | $772M | 9 | $86M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 15.53% | State |
Dallas[26] | TX | $2,800M | 14 | $200M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 36.20% | State |
Denver[27] | CO | $1,490M | 13 | $115M | $30,300M | 100 | $303M | 37.83% | State |
Detroit[28] | MI | $2,600M | 9 | $289M | $51,200M | 148 | $346M | 83.51% | State |
Durham[29] | NC | $390M | 7 | $56M | $43,800M | 170 | $258M | 21.62% | State |
El Paso[30] | TX | $801M | 8 | $100M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 18.13% | State |
Fort Wayne[31] | IN | $182M | 9 | $20M | $27,300M | 150 | $182M | 11.11% | State |
Fort Worth[32] | TX | $1,500M | 9 | $167M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 30.17% | State |
Fremont[33] | CA | $238M | 5 | $48M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 2.58% | State |
Fresno[34] | CA | $977M | 7 | $140M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 7.57% | State |
Garland[35] | TX | $629M | 9 | $70M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 12.65% | State |
Gilbert[36] | AZ | $554M | 7 | $79M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 24.65% | State |
Glendale[37] | AZ | $576M | 7 | $82M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 25.63% | State |
Greensboro[38] | NC | $472M | 9 | $52M | $43,800M | 170 | $258M | 20.36% | State |
Henderson[39] | NV | $482M | 5 | $96M | $8,730M | 63 | $139M | 69.57% | State |
Hialeah[40] | FL | $257M | 7 | $37M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 7.98% | State |
Honolulu[41] | HI | $2,100M | 9 | $233M | $11,800M | 76 | $155M | 150.28% | City |
Houston[42] | TX | $5,200M | 16 | $325M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 58.83% | State |
Indianapolis[43] | IN | $938M | 29 | $32M | $27,300M | 150 | $182M | 17.77% | State |
Irvine[44] | CA | $144M | 5 | $29M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 1.56% | State |
Irving[45] | TX | $300M | 9 | $33M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 6.03% | State |
Jacksonville[46] | FL | $1,060M | 19 | $56M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 12.13% | State |
Jersey City[47] | NJ | $500M | 9 | $56M | $53,100M | 120 | $443M | 12.55% | State |
Kansas City[48] | MO | $1,400M | 13 | $108M | $23,200M | 197 | $118M | 91.45% | State |
Laredo[49] | TX | $556M | 9 | $62M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 11.18% | State |
Las Vegas[50] | NV | $1,077M | 7 | $154M | $8,730M | 63 | $139M | 111.03% | City |
Lexington[51] | KY | $540M | 15 | $36M | $28,800M | 138 | $209M | 17.25% | State |
Lincoln[52] | NE | $159M | 7 | $23M | $10,500M | 48 | $219M | 10.38% | State |
Long Beach[53] | CA | $3,100M | 10 | $310M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 16.81% | State |
Los Angeles[54] | CA | $8,100M | 15 | $540M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 29.28% | State |
Louisville[55] | KY | $750M | 26 | $29M | $28,800M | 138 | $209M | 13.82% | State |
Lubbock[56] | TX | $675M | 7 | $96M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 17.44% | State |
Madison[57] | WI | $275M | 20 | $14M | $44,900M | 132 | $340M | 4.04% | State |
Memphis[58] | TN | $618M | 13 | $48M | $32,100M | 132 | $243M | 19.55% | State |
Mesa[59] | AZ | $1,300M | 7 | $186M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 57.83% | State |
Miami[60] | FL | $523M | 5 | $105M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 22.74% | State |
Milwaukee[61] | WI | $590M | 15 | $39M | $44,900M | 132 | $340M | 11.56% | State |
Minneapolis[62] | MN | $1,200M | 13 | $92M | $35,400M | 201 | $176M | 52.41% | State |
Nashville[63] | TN | $1,800M | 41 | $44M | $32,100M | 132 | $243M | 18.05% | State |
New Orleans[64] | LA | $505M | 7 | $72M | $28,800M | 144 | $200M | 36.07% | State |
New York[65] | NY | $73,000M | 51 | $1,431M | $134,000M | 213 | $629M | 227.52% | City |
Newark[66] | NJ | $800M | 9 | $89M | $53,100M | 120 | $443M | 20.09% | State |
Norfolk[67] | VA | $1,100M | 8 | $138M | $44,700M | 140 | $319M | 43.06% | State |
North Las Vegas[68] | NV | $492M | 5 | $98M | $8,730M | 63 | $139M | 71.01% | State |
Oakland[69] | CA | $2,000M | 8 | $250M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 13.56% | State |
Oklahoma City[70] | OK | $1,100M | 9 | $122M | $22,100M | 149 | $148M | 82.40% | State |
Omaha[71] | NE | $800M | 7 | $114M | $10,500M | 48 | $219M | 52.24% | State |
Orlando[72] | FL | $934M | 7 | $133M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 29.01% | State |
Philadelphia[73] | PA | $4,500M | 17 | $265M | $86,200M | 253 | $341M | 77.69% | State |
Phoenix[74] | AZ | $3,500M | 8 | $438M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 136.25% | City |
Pittsburgh[75] | PA | $488M | 9 | $54M | $86,200M | 253 | $341M | 15.91% | State |
Plano[76] | TX | $492M | 8 | $62M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 11.13% | State |
Portland[77] | OR | $3,600M | 5 | $720M | $28,300M | 90 | $314M | 228.98% | City |
Raleigh[78] | NC | $754M | 8 | $94M | $43,800M | 170 | $258M | 36.58% | State |
Reno[79] | NV | $359M | 7 | $51M | $8,730M | 63 | $139M | 37.01% | State |
Riverside[80] | CA | $894M | 8 | $112M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 6.06% | State |
Sacramento[81] | CA | $819M | 9 | $91M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 4.93% | State |
San Antonio[82] | TX | $2,400M | 11 | $218M | $100,000M | 181 | $552M | 39.49% | State |
San Bernardino[83] | CA | $258M | 7 | $37M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 2.00% | State |
San Diego[84] | CA | $3,000M | 9 | $333M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 18.08% | State |
San Francisco[85] | CA | $7,900M | 11 | $718M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 38.94% | State |
San Jose[86] | CA | $3,000M | 11 | $273M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 14.79% | State |
Santa Ana[87] | CA | $430M | 7 | $61M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 3.33% | State |
Scottsdale[88] | AZ | $1,300M | 7 | $186M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 57.83% | State |
Seattle[89] | WA | $4,400M | 9 | $489M | $34,300M | 147 | $233M | 209.52% | City |
St. Louis[90] | MO | $985M | 29 | $34M | $23,200M | 197 | $118M | 28.85% | State |
St. Paul[91] | MN | $516M | 7 | $74M | $35,400M | 201 | $176M | 41.81% | State |
St. Petersburg[92] | FL | $483M | 8 | $60M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 13.13% | State |
Stockton[93] | CA | $632M | 7 | $90M | $221,300M | 120 | $1,844M | 4.90% | State |
Tampa[94] | FL | $830M | 7 | $119M | $73,600M | 160 | $460M | 25.78% | State |
Toledo[95] | OH | $650M | 12 | $54M | $59,100M | 132 | $448M | 12.10% | State |
Tucson[96] | AZ | $1,265M | 7 | $181M | $28,900M | 90 | $321M | 56.28% | State |
Tulsa[97] | OK | $597M | 9 | $66M | $22,100M | 149 | $148M | 44.72% | State |
Virginia Beach[98] | VA | $1,800M | 11 | $164M | $44,700M | 140 | $319M | 51.25% | State |
Washington, D.C.[99] | - | $10,100M | 13 | $777M | - | - | - | - | - |
Wichita[100] | KS | $577M | 7 | $82M | $14,700M | 165 | $89M | 92.52% | State |
Winston-Salem[101] | NC | $379M | 9 | $42M | $43,800M | 170 | $258M | 16.34% | State |
See also
- Municipal government portal
- Budget policy by state
- Analysis of spending in America's largest school districts
- Largest cities in the United States by population
- List of current city council officials of the top 100 cities in the United States
- List of current mayors of the top 100 cities in the United States
Footnotes
- ↑ National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report: 2012-2014," accessed April 14, 2015
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 City of Albuquerque, "Adopted Operating Budget FY 2015," accessed April 16, 2015
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 City of Anaheim, "Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program FY 2014/15," accessed August 6, 2014
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 City of Anchorage, "2014 Budget in Brief," accessed September 9, 2014
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 City of Arlington, "2014 Adopted Budget," accessed September 5, 2014
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 City of Atlanta, "Atlanta Adopted Operating Budget FY 2015," accessed October 22, 2014
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 City of Aurora, "2014 Budget in Brief," accessed October 23, 2014
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 City of Austin, "City Council adopts Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Budget," September 9, 2014
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 City of Bakersfield, "FY 14-15 Budget in Brief," accessed August 11, 2014
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 City of Baltimore, "Adopted Operating Budget FY 2015," accessed October 21, 2014
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 City of Baton Rouge, "Final Budget 2014," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 City of Birmingham, "FY 2015 Budget-at-a-Glance," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 City of Boise, "2014 Budget Book," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 City of Boston, "FY2015 Budget," accessed April 2, 2015
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 City of Buffalo, "Mayor Brown Releases 2013-2014 City Budget," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 City of Chandler, "Executive Summary, FY 2014-15," June 12, 2014
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 City of Charlotte, "Budget," accessed August 28, 2014
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 City of Chesapeake, "Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2014," accessed August 28, 2014
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Chicago City Clerk, "City of Chicago 2015 Budget Overview," accessed January 27, 2015
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 City of Chula Vista, "2015 Operating Budget," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 City of Cincinnati, "2015 Approved Budget," accessed October 27, 2014
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 City of Cleveland, "2014 Annual Budget," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 City of Colorado Springs, "FY 2014 Final Budget," accessed October 22, 2014
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 City of Columbus, "2015 Operating Budget," accessed April 2, 2015
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 City of Corpus Christi, "FY 2013-14 Adopted Budget," July 30, 2013
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 City of Dallas, "2014-15 Budget Overview," accessed February 6, 2015
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 City of Denver, "2013 Budget-in-Brief," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 City of Detroit, "Budget in Brief, 2012-13," accessed September 9, 2014
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 City of Durham, "City of Durham FY14-15 Final Budget Approved," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 City of El Paso, "2014 Adopted Budget," accessed September 5, 2014
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 City of Fort Wayne, "Budget Overview, FY 2014," accessed August 25, 2014
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 City of Fort Worth, "$1.5 billion budget approved for 2015," accessed September 19, 2014
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 City of Fremont, "FY 14-15 Proposed Operating Budget," accessed August 11, 2014
- ↑ 34.0 34.1 City of Fresno, "Adopted Budget, Fiscal Year 2014," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 35.0 35.1 City of Garland, "2013-14 Adopted Budget," accessed September 5, 2014
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 City of Gilbert, "Adopted FY 2014/15 Budget," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 Glendale Budget Office, "Executive Summary: FY 2013-2014," accessed August 18, 2014
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 City of Greensboro, "Budget and Evaluation Department," accessed October 27, 2014
- ↑ 39.0 39.1 City of Henderson, "2015 Budget at-a-glance," accessed October 27, 2014
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 City of Hialeah, "Approved City Budget 2014-2015," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 Hawaii News Now, "Honolulu Council budgets millions for homelessness," June 4, 2014
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 Click 2 Houston, "City council passes $5.2 billion budget," August 6, 2014
- ↑ 43.0 43.1 2014 City of Indianapolis, "Adopted Budget for the Consolidated City of Indianapolis, Marion County," accessed October 14, 2014
- ↑ 44.0 44.1 City of Irvine, "FY 2013-14 Budget," accessed August 18, 2014
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 City of Irving, "Adopted Operating Budget 2014-15," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 46.0 46.1 City of Jacksonville, "Proposed Budget for FY 2014-15," accessed August 19, 2014
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 City of Jersey City, "Jersey City Municipal Budget Book 2014," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 City of Kansas City, "Department of Finances," accessed October 22, 2014
- ↑ 49.0 49.1 City of Laredo, "Laredo, Texas: FY 2014 Annual Budget," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 50.0 50.1 City of Las Vegas, "Final Budget FY 2015," accessed October 21, 2014
- ↑ 51.0 51.1 City of Lexington, "2015 Budget in Brief," accessed September 9, 2014
- ↑ 52.0 52.1 City of Lincoln, "Adopted 2012-2014 Biennial Budget Summary," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 City of Long Beach, "Department of Financial Management," accessed October 21, 2014
- ↑ 54.0 54.1 losangeles.cbslocal.com, "LA City, County Officials Release 2014-15 Budget Proposals," April 14, 2014
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 City of Louisville, "Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2014-15," accessed May 22, 2014
- ↑ 56.0 56.1 City of Lubbock, "Adopted Operating Budget 2013-14: Vol. 1," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 57.0 57.1 City of Madison, "Madison, WI FY 2014 Adopted Operating Budget Summaries," accessed August 18, 2014
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 City of Memphis, "2015 Budget Summary," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 59.0 59.1 City of Mesa, "City of Mesa FY 2013-14 Executive Budget Plan," accessed August 21, 2014
- ↑ 60.0 60.1 City of Miami, "Adopted Operating Budget FY 2014," accessed October 22, 2014
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 City of Milwaukee, "2014 Budget-in-Brief," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 62.0 62.1 City of Minneapolis, "City Budget," accessed October 23, 2014
- ↑ 63.0 63.1 City of Nashville, "2014 Adopted Budget," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 64.0 64.1 City of New Orleans, "2014 NOLA Adopted Budget," accessed October 23, 2014
- ↑ 65.0 65.1 New York City, "June 2014 Adopted Budget, Fiscal Year 2015," accessed July 2, 2014
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 NJ.com, "N.J. board approves Newark budget but admonishes city officials," October 14, 2014
- ↑ 67.0 67.1 City of Norfolk, "2015 Budget Overview," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 68.0 68.1 City of North Las Vegas, "All Funds Summary 2014-2015," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 69.0 69.1 City of Oakland, "Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Adopted Policy Budget," accessed March 5, 2014
- ↑ 70.0 70.1 Oklahoma City, "Budget and Finance," accessed August 12, 2014
- ↑ 71.0 71.1 City of Omaha, "2014 Adopted Budget," accessed October 22, 2014
- ↑ 72.0 72.1 City of Orlando, "2013-14 Annual Budget," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 73.0 73.1 bizjournals.com, "Nutter's budget: Expanded L&I, $16M for Streets Dept.," March 6, 2014
- ↑ 74.0 74.1 City of Phoenix, "Budget & Research Department," accessed December 2, 2014
- ↑ 75.0 75.1 City of Pittsburgh, "2014 Operating Budget," accessed October 27, 2014
- ↑ 76.0 76.1 City of Plano, "FY 2013-14, Budget in Brief," accessed August 25, 2014
- ↑ 77.0 77.1 City of Portland, "FY 2014-15 Budget in Brief," accessed September 2, 2014
- ↑ 78.0 78.1 City of Raleigh, "Adopted Operating Budget Summary FY 2015," accessed April 16, 2015
- ↑ 79.0 79.1 City of Reno, "Adopted Operating Budget 2013-14," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 80.0 80.1 City of Riverside, "2013-14 Budget in Brief," accessed October 23, 2014
- ↑ 81.0 81.1 City of Sacramento, "FY 2013-14 Budget in Brief," accessed August 18, 2014
- ↑ 82.0 82.1 City of San Antonio, "Adopted Annual Operating & Capital Budget," September 18, 2014
- ↑ 83.0 83.1 City of San Bernardino, "Preliminary Budget 2012-13/2013-14," accessed September 8, 2014
- ↑ 84.0 84.1 City of San Diego, "Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget," accessed February 6, 2015
- ↑ 85.0 85.1 City of San Francisco Mayor's Office, "Mayor Lee Signs San Francisco’s Balanced Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-14 & 2014-15," July 24, 2013
- ↑ 86.0 86.1 City of San Jose, "2014-2015 Adopted Budget in Brief," accessed April 2, 2015
- ↑ 87.0 87.1 City of Santa Ana, "Proposed Revisions to FY 2014-15 Budget," June 17, 2014
- ↑ 88.0 88.1 City of Scottsdale, "Adopted FY 2014/15 Budget Ordinance," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 89.0 89.1 City of Seattle: Finance Department, "2014 Adopted Budget," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 90.0 90.1 City of St. Louis, "2014 Annual Operating Plan," accessed September 15, 2014
- ↑ 91.0 91.1 City of St. Paul, "Adopted Operating Budget 2014 in Brief," accessed October 27, 2014
- ↑ 92.0 92.1 2015 City of St. Petersburg, "Adopted Budget-in-Brief," accessed October 28, 2014
- ↑ 93.0 93.1 City of Stockton, "2014-15 Adopted Budget," accessed September 5, 2014
- ↑ 94.0 94.1 City of Tampa, "Recommended Operating and Capitol Budget FY 2014," accessed April 16, 2015
- ↑ 95.0 95.1 City of Toledo, "Budget Office," accessed August 4, 2014
- ↑ 96.0 96.1 City of Tucson, "Adopted Operating Budget FY 2015," accessed April 16, 2015
- ↑ 97.0 97.1 City of Tulsa, "2014-15 Budget and Capital Plan: Executive Summary," accessed August 26, 2014
- ↑ 98.0 98.1 City of Virginia Beach, "FY 15 Adopted Operating Budget," accessed September 19, 2014
- ↑ 99.0 99.1 City of Washington, D.C., "FY 2014 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan," accessed August 8, 2013
- ↑ 100.0 100.1 City of Wichita, "2015-16 Adopted Operating Budget," accessed October 23, 2014
- ↑ 101.0 101.1 City of Winston-Salem, "2013-14 Adopted Operating Budget FY 2014-15," accessed April 16, 2015