Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Austin, Texas, Proposition B, Oversight of Police Measure (May 2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Austin Proposition B

Flag of Texas.png

Election date

May 6, 2023

Topic
Local law enforcement
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Initiative


Austin Proposition B was on the ballot as an initiative in Austin on May 6, 2023. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported making changes to the civilian oversight system of the Austin Police Department, including:

  • Providing that the Office of Police Oversight would be considered the central depository for documentation relevant to the provisions within the amendment;
  • Establishing the Community Police Review Commission;
  • Providing for the Office of Police Oversight to receive briefings related to investigations conducted by Community Police Review commissioners;
  • Allowing the Office of Police Oversight access to relevant records concerning a use of force incident, as well as video evidence from body-worn cameras and police officer dash cameras;
  • Providing for the police chief to retain the authority to discipline officers;
  • Removing the provision for the Office of Police Oversight to receive anonymous complaints;
  • Removing the provision for the Office of Police Oversight to participate in investigations of complaints;
  • Removing the requirement for preliminary investigations of complaints;
  • Removing the provision for the conducting random assessments of use of force reviews; and
  • Allowing for the City of Austin would continue to keep classified police department personnel files related to conduct by police officers.

A "no" vote opposed making changes to the civilian oversight system of the Austin Police Department.


Election results

Austin Proposition B

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 12,137 18.90%

Defeated No

52,069 81.10%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition B was as follows:

Shall the voters of Austin adopt an initiated ordinance, circulated by Voters for Oversight and Police Accountability, that will strengthen the City's system of independent and transparent civilian police oversight?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Measure design

Under this measure, certain provisions regarding the Office of Police Oversight would have been removed from the Austin, Texas Code of Ordinances, including the provision of the Office of Police Oversight to receive anonymous complaints, the provision to participate in investigations of complaints, the requirement for preliminary investigations of complaints, the conducting random assessments of use of force reviews.[1]

This measure was designed to provide that the Office of Police Oversight would have been considered the central depository for documentation relevant to the provisions within the amendment.[1]

This measure was designed to establish the Community Police Review Commission, which would have reviewed investigations of police misconduct, recommend to the police chief discipline that should be issued, advise on the effectiveness of the department’s policies regarding complaints of police misconduct, and address other areas of public concern.[1]

Under this measure, the Office of Police Oversight would have received briefings related to investigations conducted by Community Police Review commissioners. Under this measure, the Director of the Office of Police Oversight would also have had access to relevant records concerning use of force incidents, as well as video evidence from body-worn cameras and police officer dash cameras.[1]

Under this measure, the police chief would have retained the authority to discipline officers, and if the police chief issues a disciplinary action, they would have had to provide a detailed, public written explanation.[1]

Under this measure, the city of Austin would have continued to keep classified police department personnel files related to conduct by police officers.[1]

Support

Voters for Oversight and Police Accountability was the committee registered in support of this ballot initiative.[2]

Supporters

Unions

  • Austin Police Association

Arguments

  • Voters for Oversight and Police Accountability: "The Austin Police Oversight Act is meant to bring transparency to the Austin Police Department. Its goal is to guarantee accountability for police misconduct and give the people of Austin a way to report alleged misconduct safely and anonymously. This act will make sure that information is made public whenever possible and Austin community members, not just the police department, have a voice in the disciplinary process of police officers."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Equity Action Austin Texas

Arguments

  • Rebecca Webber, treasurer of Equity Action: "While this petition shares the same name as ours, it will establish a powerless and ineffective oversight system that is worse than the current system our ordinance seeks to strengthen."


Path to the ballot

This measure was put on the ballot through a successful citizen petition by the Voters for Oversight and Police Accountability PAC. The initiative was certified for the ballot on February 3, 2023.[1]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

How to vote in Texas


See also

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 AustinTexas.gov, "Proposition B," accessed February 23, 2023
  2. VOTERS FOR OVERSIGHT AND POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY, "Homepage," accessed February 23, 2023
  3. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  4. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  5. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
  7. Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
  8. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  9. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  10. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  11. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  12. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  13. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  14. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content