Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Bolivar Village Property Tax Levy Renewal Questions, 2 (November 2012)
|
|
A Bolivar Village Property Tax Levy Renewal question was on the November 6, 2012 election ballot in Tuscarawas County, which is in Ohio, where they were approved.
The first question authorized the Village of Bolivar to renew a property tax levy of up to 1.8 mills ($1.8 per $1,000 of assessed valuation).
The second question authorized the Village of Bolivar to renew a property tax levy of up to 2.9 mills ($2.9 per $1,000 of assessed valuation) for five years in order to fund the maintenance and improvements of roads and streets in the Village.[1]
Election results
Bolivar Village Tax Question 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 291 | 59.63% | ||
No | 197 | 40.37% |
Bolivar Village Tax Question 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 303 | 62.35% | ||
No | 183 | 37.65% |
Election results from Tuscarawas County, Election Results, December 7, 2012
Text of measure
Language on the ballot for the first measure:
“ | A renewal of a tax for the benefit of the Village of Bolivar for the purpose of maintaining roads and street improvements at a rate not exceeding 2.9 mills for each one dollar of valuation, which amounts to $0.29 for each one hundred dollars of valuation, for 5 years, commencing in 2012, first due in calendar year 2013.
FOR THE TAX LEVY AGAINST THE TAX LEVY[2] |
” |
Language on the ballot for the second measure:
“ | A renewal of a tax for the benefit of the Village of Bolivar for
the purpose of current expenses at a rate not exceeding 1.8 mills for each one dollar of valuation, which amounts to $0.18 for each one hundred dollars of valuation, for 5 years, commencing in 2012, first due in calendar year 2013. FOR THE TAX LEVY |
” |
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Tuscarawas County Elections, Bolivar Village Sample Ballot
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
|
|