Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
CHIP income limits for eligibility
Healthcare policy in the U.S. |
---|
Obamacare overview |
Obamacare lawsuits |
Medicare and Medicaid |
Healthcare statistics |
![]() |
This page is outside of Ballotpedia's current coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia.
The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) is a public healthcare program for low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid. Low-income children whose families earn too much to be eligible for Medicaid may be enrolled in CHIP, and states have some flexibility in determining the upper income limits for eligibility to enroll. However, under the ACA, states were prohibited from reducing the eligibility thresholds for CHIP from the date of the law's enactment through 2019.[1]
CHIP eligibility limits are expressed as a percentage of the federal poverty level and vary across the country. For instance, children in North Dakota may be enrolled in CHIP if their parents earn incomes between 138 percent and 175 percent of the FPL. At the other end of the spectrum, New York allows CHIP enrollment for children with families earning incomes up to 405 percent of the FPL.[2]
However, states also have flexibility in the administration of the program. States may use federal CHIP dollars to serve enrollees through Medicaid, through a separate program, or a combination of both. In programs that serve enrollees through Medicaid, income limits may vary by the child's age, while separate CHIP programs have the same income limit for children ages 0 to 18.[1]
The tables below display income limits for Medicaid and CHIP eligibility by state. For programs that serve enrollees through Medicaid, the eligibility limits are divided by age and further divided by the limits using Medicaid funding and the limits using CHIP funding. The tables also display the eligibility limit for separate CHIP programs and the highest eligibility limit for each state, whether that be through Medicaid or a separate CHIP program.
2017
Click here to view a table displaying various percentages of the 2017 federal poverty level as dollar amounts.
Medicaid and CHIP eligibility limits for children as a percentage of the federal poverty level, 2017 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Medicaid | Separate CHIP, children ages 0-18 | Upper income limit | ||||||||
Infants ages 0-1 | Children ages 1-5 | Children ages 6-18 | |||||||||
Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | ||||||
Alabama | 146% | N/A | 146% | N/A | 146% | 146% | 317% | 317% | |||
Alaska | 177% | 208% | 177% | 208% | 177% | 208% | N/A | 208% | |||
Arizona | 152% | N/A | 146% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||
Arkansas | 147% | N/A | 147% | N/A | 147% | 147% | 216% | 216% | |||
California | 208% | 266% | 142% | 266% | 133% | 266% | N/A | 266% | |||
Colorado | 147% | N/A | 147% | N/A | 147% | 147% | 265% | 265% | |||
Connecticut | 201% | N/A | 201% | N/A | 201% | N/A | 323% | 323% | |||
Delaware | 217% | 217% | 147% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 217% | 217% | |||
Florida | 211% | 211% | 145% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 215% | 215% | |||
Georgia | 210% | N/A | 154% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 252% | 252% | |||
Hawaii | 191% | 313% | 139% | 313% | 133% | 313% | N/A | 313% | |||
Idaho | 147% | N/A | 147% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 190% | 190% | |||
Illinois | 147% | N/A | 147% | N/A | 147% | 147% | 318% | 318% | |||
Indiana | 218% | 218% | 165% | 165% | 165% | 165% | 262% | 262% | |||
Iowa | 380% | 380% | 172% | N/A | 172% | 172% | 307% | 307% | |||
Kansas | 171% | N/A | 154% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 243% | 243% | |||
Kentucky | 200% | N/A | 142% | 164% | 133% | 164% | 218% | 218% | |||
Louisiana | 142% | 217% | 142% | 217% | 142% | 217% | 255% | 255% | |||
Maine | 196% | N/A | 162% | 162% | 162% | 162% | 213% | 213% | |||
Maryland | 194% | 322% | 138% | 322% | 133% | 322% | N/A | 322% | |||
Massachusetts | 205% | 205% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 305% | 305% | |||
Michigan | 195% | 217% | 160% | 217% | 160% | 217% | N/A | 217% | |||
Minnesota | 275% | 288% | 280% | N/A | 280% | N/A | N/A | 288% | |||
Mississippi | 199% | N/A | 148% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 214% | 214% | |||
Missouri | 201% | N/A | 148% | 155% | 148% | 155% | 305% | 305% | |||
Montana | 148% | N/A | 148% | N/A | 138% | 148% | 266% | 266% | |||
Nebraska | 162% | 218% | 145% | 218% | 133% | 218% | N/A | 218% | |||
Nevada | 165% | N/A | 165% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||
New Hampshire | 196% | 323% | 196% | 323% | 196% | 323% | N/A | 323% | |||
New Jersey | 199% | N/A | 147% | N/A | 147% | 147% | 355% | 355% | |||
New Mexico | 240% | 305% | 240% | 305% | 190% | 245% | N/A | 305% | |||
New York | 223% | N/A | 154% | N/A | 154% | 154% | 405% | 405% | |||
North Carolina | 215% | 215% | 215% | 215% | 138% | 138% | 216% | 216% | |||
North Dakota | 152% | N/A | 152% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 175% | 175% | |||
Ohio | 156% | 141%-211% | 156% | 211% | 156% | 211% | N/A | 211% | |||
Oklahoma | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | N/A | 210% | |||
Oregon | 190% | 190% | 138% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 305% | 305% | |||
Pennsylvania | 220% | N/A | 162% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 319% | 319% | |||
Rhode Island | 190% | 266% | 142% | 266% | 133% | 266% | N/A | 266% | |||
South Carolina | 194% | 213% | 143% | 213% | 133% | 213% | N/A | 213% | |||
South Dakota | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 209% | 209% | |||
Tennessee | 195% | 216% | 142% | 216% | 133% | 216% | 255% | 255% | |||
Texas | 203% | N/A | 149% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 206% | 206% | |||
Utah | 144% | N/A | 144% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||
Vermont | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | N/A | 317% | |||
Virginia | 148% | N/A | 148% | N/A | 148% | 148% | 205% | 205% | |||
Washington | 215% | N/A | 215% | N/A | 215% | N/A | 317% | 317% | |||
West Virginia | 163% | N/A | 146% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 305% | 305% | |||
Wisconsin | 306% | N/A | 191% | N/A | 133% | 156% | 306% | 306% | |||
Wyoming | 159% | N/A | 159% | N/A | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Medicaid and CHIP Income Eligibility Limits for Children as a Percent of the Federal Poverty Level" |
Federal poverty levels as dollar amounts
Incomes as percentage of 2017 federal poverty level | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family size | 100% FPL | 138% FPL | 200% FPL | 250% FPL | 300% FPL | 400% FPL |
1 | $12,060 | $16,643 | $24,120 | $30,150 | $36,180 | $48,240 |
2 | $16,240 | $22,411 | $32,480 | $40,600 | $48,720 | $64,960 |
3 | $20,420 | $28,180 | $40,840 | $51,050 | $61,260 | $81,680 |
4 | $24,600 | $33,948 | $49,200 | $61,500 | $73,800 | $98,400 |
Source: Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Poverty Guidelines" Amounts above 100 percent FPL calculated by Ballotpedia. |
2016
Click [show] on the red bar below to view the table. Click here to view a table displaying various percentages of the 2016 federal poverty level as dollar amounts.
Medicaid and CHIP eligibility limits for children as a percentage of the federal poverty level, 2016 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Medicaid | Separate CHIP, children ages 0-18 | Upper income limit | ||||||||
Infants ages 0-1 | Children ages 1-5 | Children ages 6-18 | |||||||||
Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | Medicaid funded | CHIP funded | ||||||
Alabama | 146% | 146% | 146% | 146% | 317% | 317% | |||||
Alaska | 177% | 208% | 177% | 208% | 177% | 208% | 208% | ||||
Arizona | 152% | 146% | 138% | 138% | 200% | 152% | |||||
Arkansas | 147% | 147% | 147% | 147% | 216% | 216% | |||||
California | 208% | 266% | 142% | 266% | 133% | 266% | 266% | ||||
Colorado | 147% | 147% | 147% | 147% | 265% | 265% | |||||
Connecticut | 201% | 201% | 201% | 323% | 323% | ||||||
Delaware | 194% | 217% | 147% | 138% | 138% | 217% | 217% | ||||
District of Columbia | 324% | 324% | 324% | 324% | 324% | 324% | 324% | ||||
Florida | 211% | 211% | 145% | 138% | 138% | 215% | 215% | ||||
Georgia | 210% | 154% | 138% | 138% | 252% | 252% | |||||
Hawaii | 191% | 313% | 139% | 313% | 133% | 313% | 313% | ||||
Idaho | 147% | 147% | 138% | 138% | 190% | 190% | |||||
Illinois | 147% | 147% | 147% | 147% | 318% | 318% | |||||
Indiana | 218% | 165% | 165% | 165% | 165% | 262% | 263% | ||||
Iowa | 380% | 380% | 172% | 172% | 172% | 307% | 380% | ||||
Kansas | 171% | 154% | 138% | 138% | 244% | 244% | |||||
Kentucky | 200% | 142% | 164% | 142% | 164% | 218% | 218% | ||||
Louisiana | 142% | 217% | 142% | 217% | 142% | 217% | 255% | 255% | |||
Maine | 196% | 162% | 162% | 162% | 162% | 213% | 213% | ||||
Maryland | 194% | 322% | 138% | 322% | 133% | 322% | 322% | ||||
Massachusetts | 205% | 205% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 305% | 305% | |||
Michigan | 195% | 217% | 160% | 217% | 160% | 217% | 217% | ||||
Minnesota | 275% | 288% | 280% | 280% | 288% | ||||||
Mississippi | 199% | 148% | 138% | 138% | 214% | 214% | |||||
Missouri | 201% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 155% | 305% | 305% | ||||
Montana | 148% | 148% | 148% | 266% | 266% | ||||||
Nebraska | 162% | 218% | 145% | 218% | 133% | 218% | 218% | ||||
Nevada | 165% | 165% | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||||
New Hampshire | 196% | 323% | 196% | 323% | 196% | 323% | 323% | ||||
New Jersey | 199% | 147% | 147% | 147% | 355% | 355% | |||||
New Mexico | 240% | 305% | 240% | 305% | 190% | 245% | 305% | ||||
New York | 223% | 154% | 154% | 154% | 405% | 405% | |||||
North Carolina | 215% | 215% | 215% | 215% | 138% | 138% | 216% | 216% | |||
North Dakota | 152% | 152% | 138% | 138% | 175% | 175% | |||||
Ohio | 156% | 211% | 156% | 211% | 156% | 211% | 211% | ||||
Oklahoma | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | 210% | ||||
Oregon | 190% | 190% | 138% | 138% | 138% | 305% | 305% | ||||
Pennsylvania | 220% | 162% | 138% | 138% | 319% | 319% | |||||
Rhode Island | 190% | 266% | 142% | 266% | 133% | 266% | 266% | ||||
South Carolina | 194% | 213% | 143% | 213% | 133% | 213% | 213% | ||||
South Dakota | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 187% | 209% | 209% | |||
Tennessee | 195% | 216% | 142% | 216% | 133% | 216% | 255% | 255% | |||
Texas | 203% | 149% | 138% | 138% | 206% | 206% | |||||
Utah | 144% | 144% | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||||
Vermont | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | 317% | ||||
Virginia | 148% | 148% | 148% | 148% | 205% | 205% | |||||
Washington | 215% | 215% | 215% | 317% | 317% | ||||||
West Virginia | 163% | 146% | 138% | 138% | 305% | 305% | |||||
Wisconsin | 306% | 191% | 133% | 156% | 306% | 306% | |||||
Wyoming | 159% | 159% | 138% | 138% | 205% | 205% | |||||
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Medicaid and CHIP Income Eligibility Limits for Children as a Percent of the Federal Poverty Level" |
Federal poverty levels as dollar amounts
Click [show] on the red bar below to view the table.
Incomes as percentage of 2016 federal poverty level | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family size | 100% FPL | 138% FPL | 200% FPL | 250% FPL | 300% FPL | 400% FPL |
1 | $11,880 | $16,394 | $23,760 | $29,700 | $35,640 | $47,520 |
2 | $16,020 | $22,108 | $32,040 | $40,050 | $48,060 | $64,080 |
3 | $20,160 | $27,821 | $40,320 | $50,400 | $60,480 | $80,640 |
4 | $24,300 | $33,534 | $48,600 | $60,750 | $72,900 | $97,200 |
Source: Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Poverty Guidelines" Amounts above 100 percent FPL calculated by Ballotpedia. |
See also
External links
- National Conference of State Legislatures, "Children's Health Insurance Program Overview"
- The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Children’s Health Coverage: Medicaid, CHIP and the ACA"
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Footnotes