Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

California Proposition 162, Public Employee Retirement Benefits Initiative (1992)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 162

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 3, 1992

Topic
Public employee retirement funds
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Initiated constitutional amendment
Origin

Citizens



California Proposition 162 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in California on November 3, 1992. It was approved.

A “yes” vote supported giving the board of a public employee retirement system the sole ability to make decisions over the system, requiring the prompt delivery of benefits, and prohibiting making changes to the board without voter approval.

A “no” vote opposed giving the board of a public employee retirement system the sole ability to make decisions over the system, requiring the prompt delivery of benefits, and prohibiting making changes to the board without voter approval.


Election results

California Proposition 162

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

5,066,530 51.00%
No 4,867,681 49.00%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEMS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. • Grants the board of a public employee retirement system sole and exclusive authority over investment decisions and administration of the system. • Requires board to administer system so as to assure prompt delivery of benefits to participants and beneficiaries. • Provides that board's duty to participants and beneficiaries takes precedence over any other duty. • Grants board sole and exclusive power to provide for actuarial services. • Prohibits changing number, terms, and method of selection or removal of members of board without approval of voters of the jurisdiction in which participants of the retirement system are employed. Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact: • Unknown fiscal effect from giving public pension boards complete authority over assets and administration of the systems. • Potential costs to employers as a result of public pension system giving highest priority to providing benefits to members and their beneficiaries. • Annual savings of $1 million to $3 million to the state's Public Employees' Retirement System for actuarial services.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in California

In California, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For initiated amendments filed in 1992, at least 615,958 valid signatures were required.

See also


External links

Footnotes