Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
California Proposition 42, Allocation of Gasoline Sales Tax Revenue Amendment (March 2002)
California Proposition 42 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date March 5, 2002 | |
Topic State and local government budgets, spending and finance | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 42 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on March 5, 2002. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to require that revenue from the gasoline sales tax be allocated for transportation purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment to require that revenue from the gasoline sales tax be allocated for transportation purposes. |
Overview
Proposition 42 provided that, from the 2003–2004 through 2007–2008 fiscal years, gasoline sales tax revenues were used for specified state and local transportation purposes. The revenues were allocated for transportation purposes specified under the Transportation Congestion Relief Program.
Proposition 42 also required that starting in the 2008–2009 fiscal year, the gasoline sales tax revenues would be allocated as follows:
- 20% to public transportation;
- 40% to transportation improvement projects funded in the State Transportation Improvement Program, a five-year transportation capital investment program; and
- 40% to local streets and roads improvements; with half of the amount (20%) allocated to counties and half to cities.
Election results
California Proposition 42 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
3,355,553 | 69.05% | |||
No | 1,503,727 | 30.95% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 42 was as follows:
“ | Transportation Congestion Improvement Act. Allocation of Existing Motor Vehicle Fuel Sales and Use Tax Revenues for Transportation Purposes Only. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ |
| ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal impact statement
The fiscal impact statement was as follows:
“ |
|
” |
Support
Supporters
- California Alliance for Jobs
- Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3
Opposition
Opponents
- California Teachers Association
- Service Employees International Union
- California Federation of Teachers
- California Faculty Association
Path to the ballot
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
Proposition 42 was voted onto the ballot by the California State Legislature via Assembly Constitutional Amendment 4 of the 2001–2002 Regular Session (Resolution Chapter 87, Statutes of 2001)
Votes in legislature to refer to ballot | ||
---|---|---|
Chamber | Ayes | Noes |
Assembly | 68 | 2 |
Senate | 36 | 1 |
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |