Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

California Proposition 68, Tribal Gaming Compacts Initiative (2004)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 68
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 2, 2004
Topic
Gambling
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Amendment
& Statute
Origin
Citizens

California Proposition 68 was on the ballot as a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute in California on November 2, 2004. It was defeated.

A "yes" voted supported requiring American Indian tribes to pay 25 percent of slot machine and gaming device returns or allow non-tribal racetracks and gaming establishments to operate slot machines and gaming devices. 

A "no" voted opposed requiring American Indian tribes to pay 25 percent of slot machine and gaming device returns or allow non-tribal racetracks and gaming establishments to operate slot machines and gaming devices. 


Election results

California Proposition 68

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 1,897,177 16.22%

Defeated No

9,801,284 83.78%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 68 was as follows:

Non-Tribal Commercial Gambling Expansion. Tribal Gaming Compact Amendments. Revenues, Tax Exemptions. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

  • Authorizes Governor to negotiate tribal compact amendments requiring that Indian tribes pay 25% of slot machine/gaming device revenues to government fund, comply with multiple state laws, and accept state court jurisdiction.
  • If compacted tribes don't unanimously accept required amendments within 90 days, or if determined unlawful, authorizes sixteen specified non-tribal racetracks and gambling establishments to operate 30,000 slot machines/gaming devices, paying 33% of net revenues to fund government public safety, regulatory, social programs.
  • Provides exemption from specified state/local tax increases

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Fiscal impact statement

The fiscal impact statement was as follows:

  • Increased gambling revenues--potentially over $1 billion annually. The revenues would be provided primarily to local governments throughout the state for additional child protective, police, and firefighting services.
  • Depending on outcome of tribal negotiations, potential loss of state revenues totaling hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

[1]


Support

Supporters

  • Magna Entertainment n
  • Los Alamitos Race Course
  • Bay Meadows Land
  • Churchill Downs
  • Bicycle Casino
  • Hawaiian Gardens Casino
  • California Commerce Club

Opposition

Opponents

Tribes

  • Auburn Rancheria
  • Rumsey Band of Wintun Indians
  • Pala Band of Mission Indians
  • Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
  • Morongo Band of Mission Indians
  • Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians

Unions

  • AFL-CIO

Path to the ballot

In California, the number of signatures required for a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For combined initiatives filed in 2004, at least 598,105 valid signatures were required.


See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.