California Proposition 70, Tribal Gaming Compacts Initiative (2004)
| California Proposition 70 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 2, 2004 | |
| Topic Gambling | |
Status Defeated | |
| Type Amendment & Statute | Origin Citizens |
California Proposition 70 was on the ballot as a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute in California on November 2, 2004. It was defeated.
A "yes" voted supported requiring the governor to execute a gaming compact at the request of a federally recognized American Indian tribe. |
A "no" voted opposed requiring the governor to execute a gaming compact at the request of a federally recognized American Indian tribe. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 70 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 2,763,800 | 23.74% | ||
|
|
8,880,110 | 76.26% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 70 was as follows:
| “ | Tribal Gaming Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights. Contributions to State. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ |
| ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal impact statement
The following was the fiscal impact statement:
| “ |
|
” |
Path to the ballot
In California, the number of signatures required for a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For a combined initiative filed in 2004, at least 598,105 valid signatures were required.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
