Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Denver, Colorado, Referred Question 2O, Development of Park Hill Golf Course Measure (April 2023)
Denver Referred Question 2O | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Local zoning, land use, and development |
|
Status |
|
Type Referral |
|
Denver Referred Question 2O was on the ballot as a referral in Denver on April 4, 2023. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported lifting the conservation easement on the Park Hill Golf Course that requires the land to be used primarily for golf-related purposes, thereby allowing commercial and residential development of the land into housing, and public park and trail space. |
A "no" vote opposed lifting the conservation easement on the Park Hill Golf Course, thereby continuing to require the land to be used primarily for golf-related purposes. |
Election results
Denver Referred Question 2O |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 69,934 | 41.18% | ||
99,905 | 58.82% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Referred Question 2O was as follows:
“ | Shall the voters of the City and County of Denver authorize the release of the City-owned conservation easement on privately owned property known as the Park Hill Golf Course, which requires the land to be used primarily for golf-related purposes, and allow for commercial and residential development, including affordable housing, and public regional park, trail and open space? | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Support
Vote Yes on 2O- Yes for Parks & Homes led the campaign in support of the measure.
Supporters
Arguments
- Vote Yes on 2O- Yes for Parks & Homes said, "The defunct Park Hill Golf Course in Northeast Denver closed in 2018 and is privately-owned land. Denver has a city-wide shortage of high-quality, affordable housing at nearly every price point. A YES vote will get over 2,500 new homes, and guarantees the creation of the 4th largest park in the city. The easement expressly forbids other land uses that limits the ability of a full golf course to exist on site. The only way to have new public parks and new housing is to lift the easement."[2]
Opposition
No on 2O, Yes for Parks and Open Space led the campaign against the measure.
Opponents
- Former state senator and current City Council candidate Penfield Tate[3]
- Denver mayoral candidate Lisa Calderon[3]
Arguments
- Yes for Parks and Open Space said, "This all-volunteer group came together because of the shared sense of the importance of saving the last piece of significant Denver open space that could become a new park with the goal of having the City eventually purchase the PHGC land for a fabulous regional park. This part of Denver needs green space; it’s densely developed with negative public health effects and lots of infill development potential.
The City and citizens of Denver paid for the Conservation Easement to protect this land from development. Contrary to the claims of the City Administration and the developer (Westside Investment Partners), the PHGC land DOES NOT need to be operated as a golf course if the Conservation Easement is preserved. The City and Developer’s “community input” process has been a sham: Residents do NOT want this land developed."Cite error: Closing </ref>
missing for <ref>
tag
Path to the ballot
The measure was referred to the ballot by the Denver City Council.
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Colorado
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Westword, "Is Robert Smith Involved in the Park Hill Golf Course Development?" accessed March 30, 2023
- ↑ Yes for Parks and Homes, "Home," accessed March 30, 2023
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Denverite, "Referred Question 2O: The one about ending Park Hill Golf Course’s conservation easement and building a massive development on it," accessed March 30, 2023
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes, § 1-7-101," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Colorado Voter Registration Form," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
|