News and analysis right to your inbox. Click to get Ballotpedia’s newsletters!

Derek Guy Johnson

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Derek Guy Johnson
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Superior Court of Orange County
Tenure
2000 - Present
Term ends
2027
Years in position
25

Elections and appointments
Last election
March 3, 2020
Appointed
2000
Education
Bachelor's
Santa Clara University
Law
University of San Diego

Derek Guy Johnson is a judge of the Superior Court of Orange County in California. He assumed office in 2000. His current term ends on January 4, 2027.

Johnson won re-election for judge of the Superior Court of Orange County in California outright in the primary on March 3, 2020, after the primary and general election were canceled.

Biography

Education

Johnson received his undergraduate degree from Santa Clara University and his J.D. from the University of San Diego.[1]

Career

  • 2000-2015: Judge, Superior Court of Orange County
  • 1989-2000: Attorney in private practice
  • 1987-1989: Attorney, Thrifty Corporation
  • 1979-1987: Deputy district attorney, Orange County District Attorney's Office[2]

Elections

2020

See also: Municipal elections in Orange County, California (2020)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Derek Guy Johnson (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

2014

See also: California judicial elections, 2014
Johnson ran for re-election to the Orange County Superior Court.
Primary: He was elected in the primary on June 3, 2014, receiving 61.3 percent of the vote. He competed against Helen Hayden.[3][4] 

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Derek Guy Johnson did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy events

Admonishment for rape sentence

In December 2012, Judge Johnson was admonished by the California Commission on Judicial Performance for violating his impartiality during a sexual assault case in 2008. After a jury found the defendant guilty on seven counts of rape and other violations, Johnson imposed a sentence of only six years in prison instead of the sixteen sought by the prosecutor. When the prosecutor questioned that decision, Johnson said,

If someone doesn't want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case.[5][6]

The commission unanimously found that Johnson failed to act "in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary," and that he "improperly relied on his own 'expert opinion'...rather than evidence before him." Johnson admitted that his comments were inappropriate, and he apologized.[5][7]

Read the full transcript of the conversation between attorney and judge [here http://cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/public_admon/Johnson_DO_Pub_Adm_12-13-2012.pdf].[5]

See also


External links

Footnotes